1993
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a037179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Representative Bureaucracy: Further Evidence of Active Representation in the EEOC District Offices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, Keiser et al (2002) found that the presence of female math teachers was associated with better performance of female math students. Several other studies have found similar results and have further specified the underlying theoretical linkages (Hindera, 1993;Lim, 2006;Meier, 1993b;Meier and Nicholson-Crotty, 2006;Saltzstein, 1979;Wilkins & Keiser, 2006). Based on this work, one may hypothesize that women in supervisory positions in STEM fields in federal departments and agencies will work to promote the interests of women who apply for work in STEM fields and will act to help ensure the success of women once they are hired.…”
Section: The Principal Independent Variablesupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Furthermore, Keiser et al (2002) found that the presence of female math teachers was associated with better performance of female math students. Several other studies have found similar results and have further specified the underlying theoretical linkages (Hindera, 1993;Lim, 2006;Meier, 1993b;Meier and Nicholson-Crotty, 2006;Saltzstein, 1979;Wilkins & Keiser, 2006). Based on this work, one may hypothesize that women in supervisory positions in STEM fields in federal departments and agencies will work to promote the interests of women who apply for work in STEM fields and will act to help ensure the success of women once they are hired.…”
Section: The Principal Independent Variablesupporting
confidence: 60%
“…For example, increases in the number of federal bureaucrats of color are associated with more positive loan application decisions in the U.S. Farmers Home Administration (Selden 1997), more EPA enforcement actions in local communities with high levels of race-related social vulnerability and severe environmental inequities (Liang, Park and Zho 2020), more discrimination investigations and charges filed on behalf of Black and Latinx people through the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (Hindera 1993), and increases in federal contracts to minority-owned firms (Brunjes and Kellough 2018). Law enforcement bureaucracies with more racial and ethnic descriptive representation tend to engage in less intensive immigration enforcement of Latinx immigrants (Chand 2020;Lewis et al 2013), are viewed as more trustworthy, fairer, and more legitimate among communities of color (Riccucci, Van Ryzin and Jackson 2018), and have officers of color that are less likely to use severe force against Black people (Headley and Wright 2020).…”
Section: Representative Bureaucracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kennedy (2014, p. 404) notes a wide variety of variables have been explored in the representative bureaucracy literature. Most common are variables measuring race, gender, and class/income; still other variables included: religion, regional origin, educational attainment, age, and party affiliation (Kennedy, 2014, p. 404; see also Hindera, 1993; Meier & Stewart, 1992; Meier et al, 1999). 6 We controlled for race and ethnicity with “1” or “0” binary coding for the variables Black and Hispanic; similarly, we controlled for gender identity (1 = Female, 0 = Not Female).…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%