1968
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9394(68)91794-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repeated Applanation Tonometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
40
1

Year Published

1980
1980
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
40
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Repeated measurements of IOP taken with an applanation tonometer resulted in a significant lessening of IOP, even with the protocol requiring at least a one-hour separation of the three measurements taken within each visit. The IOP-reducing effect of repeated applanation has been reported, [21][22][23] although most studies of this effect involved repeated measurements over several minutes rather than the several hour interval in this study. We did not control for diurnal variation in IOP, which has been reported to result in a mean range of 5.8 mmHg in patients with open-angle glaucoma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Repeated measurements of IOP taken with an applanation tonometer resulted in a significant lessening of IOP, even with the protocol requiring at least a one-hour separation of the three measurements taken within each visit. The IOP-reducing effect of repeated applanation has been reported, [21][22][23] although most studies of this effect involved repeated measurements over several minutes rather than the several hour interval in this study. We did not control for diurnal variation in IOP, which has been reported to result in a mean range of 5.8 mmHg in patients with open-angle glaucoma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…18 The intrasession repeatability of GAT and IOPg measurements have generally been found to be within about 2 mm Hg. [18][19][20][21][22][23][24] In addition, inter-examiner variability or bias is an issue that is theoretically eliminated with the use of an objective assessment of IOP such as ORA-generated IOPg that would eliminate the need for masked IOP assessment protocols in the research setting. In a population-based epidemiologic study, Dielemans et al 19 investigated GAT test-retest reliability and found a mean intra-observer variation of 1.64 mm Hg and inter-observer variation of 1.79 mm Hg.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Except for other possible reasons, discussed below, the fact of IOP not undergoing any change or increasing just a bit can be due primarily to the employed measuring method, for, despite the fact that Perkins' manual applanation tonometry is a valuable instrument in clinical and laboratorial IOP measurements, small alterations are inherent in the subjective character of this method (11) . In addition, IOP values were shown to vary constantly (12) . So, it is hard to obtain two IOP measurements with a high level of reliability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%