2013 IEEE International Conference ON Emerging Trends in Computing, Communication and Nanotechnology (ICECCN) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/ice-ccn.2013.6528565
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removing snow from an image via image decomposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike the characteristics of atmospheric particles in rainy and hazy images that might be described as relatively similar in spatial frequency, trajectory, and translucency, the variations in the particle shape and size of snow makes it more complex. However, existing snow removal methods inherited priors of rainfall-driven features, e.g., HOG [1,25], frequency space separation [26] and color assumptions [30,31] to model falling snow particles. These features not only model just the partial characteristics of snow, but worsen the prospects of generalization.…”
Section: Snow Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the characteristics of atmospheric particles in rainy and hazy images that might be described as relatively similar in spatial frequency, trajectory, and translucency, the variations in the particle shape and size of snow makes it more complex. However, existing snow removal methods inherited priors of rainfall-driven features, e.g., HOG [1,25], frequency space separation [26] and color assumptions [30,31] to model falling snow particles. These features not only model just the partial characteristics of snow, but worsen the prospects of generalization.…”
Section: Snow Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, a snow dataset named Snow100K 2 [8] is utilized for training and testing, and it contains synthesized snowy images, relevant clean images and snow masks. We employ 8000 snow masks of disparate scales and 10000 clean background images to generate 18620 synthesized snowy images.…”
Section: A Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low-frequency components were used as the guide graph to remove the rain and snow components from the high-frequency portion. Based on morphological analysis, Rajderkar and Mohod [8] used dictionary learning and sparse representation to detect rain and snow and employed smooth filtering to repair pixels covered by rain and snow. Unfortunately, this method causes image blurring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bossu et al [20] separated the foreground and background by using Gaussian Mixture Model and constructed the snow features in foreground with the Histogram of Orientations of Snow Streaks. Rajderkar et al [29] proposed an image decomposition approach based on Morphological component analysis, where the image would be decomposed into low and high frequency (LF/HF) parts by bilateral filters firstly and then applying dictionary learning and sparse coding methods to identify snow components later. Xu et al [30] modelled snow particles by colour assumptions and removed snow with a guidance image.…”
Section: Snow Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rajderkar et al. [29] proposed an image decomposition approach based on Morphological component analysis, where the image would be decomposed into low and high frequency (LF/HF) parts by bilateral filters firstly and then applying dictionary learning and sparse coding methods to identify snow components later. Xu et al.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%