Reliability and validity of the Italian nose obstruction symptom evaluation (I-NOSE) scale

Mozzanica, Francesco; Urbani, Emanuele; Atac, Murat; Scottà, Gianluca; Luciano, Ketty; Bulgheroni, Claudia; Cristofaro, Valeria De; Gera, Roberto; Schindler, Antonio; Ottaviani, F.

doi:10.1007/s00405-013-2426-z

Cited by 43 publications

(93 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…We used a paired t-test to evaluate responsiveness by comparing the scores before and after surgical treatment. The NOSE scores before and after surgery were significantly different, which was similar to the results of previous studies (3)(4)(5)(6).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 90%

“…The medical or surgical treatment of nasal obstruction is very common in rhinology practice (3)(4)(5)(6). The clinical diagnosis of nasal airway obstruction (NAO) is usually based on the patient's subjective feelings and the physician's assessment.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale was designed by Stewart et al (3) in 2004 and it has already been validated in French (4), Portuguese (5), Italian (6), and Greek (9). The scale was intended to provide an opportunity to determine the patient's subjective feelings.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Reliability and Validity of Turkish Nose Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) Scale

Karahatay¹,

Taşlı²,

Karakoç³

et al. 2018

Turk J Med Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background/aim: The aim of this study was to validate the Turkish Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (T-NOSE) scale. Materials and methods:The NOSE scale was translated into Turkish. A prospective study was conducted involving adult subjects with nasal obstruction and a control group. The patients were divided into three groups, namely nasal septum deviation (NSD), septoplasty, and control groups. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, validity, responsiveness, and the magnitude of the effect of surgery were all investigated.Results: In total, 253 subjects were enrolled in the study. Cronbach's alpha was 0.938 and 0.942 upon test and retest, respectively, which proved good internal consistency. The mean kappa value was 0.82, indicating a high level of reproducibility. The difference between postoperative and control groups was not statistically significant (P < 0.05). The T-NOSE score of the NSD group was 65.67 ± 16.77, while it was 10.75 ± 12.25 for the control group (P < 0.01). The mean score improved following septoplasty (P < 0.001). The magnitude of the effect of surgery was considered high. The correlation between the visual analogue scale and NOSE scores was 0.948. Conclusion:The T-NOSE scale is a valid instrument with good internal consistency, reliability, reproducibility, validity, and responsiveness.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 90%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Reliability and Validity of Turkish Nose Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) Scale

Karahatay¹,

Taşlı²,

Karakoç³

et al. 2018

Turk J Med Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…More studies including the correlation of %PNIF and objective measurements, such as acoustic rhinomanometry and acoustic rhinometry, are necessary 1 . The NOSE scale is more frequently used in septal deviation assessment, in pre and posttreatment in adults 10,27,28 . Regarding the reliability of NOSE scale, the correlations found (NOSE versus rhinomanometry and NOSE versus VAS) were considered good for groups with and without obstruction and for individual measurements over time 27 .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The NOSE scale is more frequently used in septal deviation assessment, in pre and posttreatment in adults 10,27,28 . Regarding the reliability of NOSE scale, the correlations found (NOSE versus rhinomanometry and NOSE versus VAS) were considered good for groups with and without obstruction and for individual measurements over time 27 . Another study in adults with nasal and mouth breathing has found a negative moderate correlation between NOSE and PNIF 16 .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Nasal patency and craniocervical posture in scholar children

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

One hundred thirty-three children were distributed into two groups: G1 (normal nasal patency -PNIF higher than 80% of predicted value) with 90 children; G2 (decreased nasal patency -PNIF lower than 80% of predicted value) with 43 children. Differences between groups were not found in CD and HHA measures. FE was significantly higher in G2 than G1 (p=0.023). Negative weak correlation between p=0.002) Palabras clave |

show abstract

Evaluation of Measurement Properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After Rhinoplasty

Zijl

Mokkink

Haagsma

et al. 2019

JAMA Facial Plast Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IMPORTANCEThe number of available rhinoplasty outcome measurement instruments has increased rapidly over the past years. A large heterogeneity of instruments of different quality now exists, causing difficulty in pooling and comparing outcome data. OBJECTIVE To critically appraise, summarize, and compare the measurement properties of all patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) that measure functional or aesthetic symptoms of patients undergoing rhinoplasty, using consensus-based methodology and guidelines. This facilitates an evidence-based recommendation on the most suitable instrument to measure rhinoplasty outcomes and identifies promising instruments worthy of further research.EVIDENCE REVIEW A systematic literature search of Embase, Medline, and Web of Science was conducted from the databases' respective inception dates to May 18, 2018. Thirty-three articles evaluating 1 or more measurement properties of instruments measuring symptoms related to nasal breathing or satisfaction with nasal appearance in patients who had undergone septoplasty and/or rhinoplasty were included. Measurement properties were graded according to the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guidelines for systematic reviews of PROMs.FINDINGS The search strategy identified 33 studies that used 12 different measurement instruments. In general, high-quality studies on measurement properties of instruments measuring aesthetic and/or functional symptom-specific outcome of rhinoplasty are scarce. The Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale demonstrated high-quality evidence for sufficient structural validity, internal consistency, reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness, along with favorable interpretability and feasibility aspects, and was therefore selected as the most suitable instrument to measure functional outcome. Among instruments measuring aesthetic outcome, the FACE-Q and Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey (SCHNOS) aesthetic subscale are recommended for further study. Future studies on the measurement properties of the identified PROMs, in particular content validity studies, are necessary.CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Three instruments with high potential for further use were identified in a systematic review of rhinoplasty outcome instruments using a standardized, consensus-based methodology: the NOSE, FACE-Q, and SCHNOS. These findings may contribute to standardized collection of outcome data in rhinoplasty.

show abstract

Reliability and validity of the Italian nose obstruction symptom evaluation (I-NOSE) scale

Cited by 43 publications

References 25 publications

Reliability and Validity of Turkish Nose Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) Scale

Reliability and Validity of Turkish Nose Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) Scale

Nasal patency and craniocervical posture in scholar children

Evaluation of Measurement Properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After Rhinoplasty

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About