The NOSE scale is a questionnaire assessing QOL related with nasal obstruction. The aim of this study was to culturally adapt the NOSE scale into Italian (I-NOSE). Prospective instrument validation study. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation were accomplished. Cronbach α was used to test internal consistency in 116 patients complaining nasal obstruction and 232 asymptomatic subjects. Pearson and ICC tests were used for test-retest reliability analysis. Normative data were gathered from the 232 asymptomatic subjects. Mann-Whitney test was used to compare the I-NOSE scores in patients and asymptomatic subjects and in 40 patients before and after septoplasty. I-NOSE scores obtained in 60 patients were correlated with rhinomanometric results and with the score of a visual analog scale (VAS) measuring the subjective sensation of nasal obstruction. Good internal consistency and good test-retest reliability were found. I-NOSE mean score of the normal cohort was 12.1 ± 13.2. Asymptomatic subjects scored lower than patients with nasal obstruction (p = 0.001). Positive correlations between I-NOSE scores and VAS and rhinomanometric results were found. The mean I-NOSE score improved from 64.4 ± 23.6 to 22.1 ± 13.5 after septoplasty (p < 0.001). The I-NOSE scale is a reliable, valid, self-administered, symptom-specific questionnaire; its application is recommended.

Objectives:We sought to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Italian EAT-10 (Italian Eating Assessment Tool; I-EAT-10). Methods:The study consisted of 4 phases: item generation, internal consistency and reliability analysis, normative data generation, and validity analysis. Discussion of the EAT-10 with 30 patients and its back-translation were accomplished. The recruited population included 172 patients (40 with dysphonia and 132 with dysphagia) and 269 asymptomatic subjects for testing of internal consistency, and 94 patients with dysphagia and 158 asymptomatic subjects for test-retest reliability analysis. Normative data were gathered from the 269 subjects. The scores of patients and asymptomatic subjects were compared. The I-EAT-10 and flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) scores in 94 patients were correlated. The I-EAT-10 scores made before and after successful swallowing rehabilitation in 38 patients were compared.Results: Excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha values of 0.90 and 0.93) and strong test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.95 and 0.98) were found in patients and asymptomatic subjects. The I-EAT-10 mean (±SD) score of the normal cohort was 0.6 ± 1.1. The asymptomatic subjects and dysphonic patients scored lower than the dysphagic patients on the Kruskal-Wallis test (p = 0.001). The I-EAT-10 and FEES scores were mildly correlated. The mean I-EAT-10 score improved from 9.8 ± 10.3 to 5.8 ± 6.7 after swallowing rehabilitation (p = 0.04). Conclusions:The I-EAT-10 is a reliable, valid, symptom-specific outcome tool.

No abstract