Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2004
DOI: 10.1007/bf02638588
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability and validity of cervical auscultation: A controlled comparison using videofluoroscopy

Abstract: Cervical auscultation is experiencing a renaissance as an adjunct to the clinical swallowing assessment. It is a controversial technique with a small evidence base. We have aimed to establish whether cervical auscultation interpretation is based on the actual sounds heard or, in practice, influenced by information gleaned from other aspects of the clinical assessment, medical notes, or previous knowledge. We sought to determine (a) rater reliability and its impact on the clinical value of cervical auscultation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
89
0
6

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
89
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar phenomenon has been reported in two studies of the application of cervical auscultation in determining the sounds of swallowing, with certain individuals proving much more consistent in their responses than their peers. 47,48 Leslie and colleagues reported intra-rater k values ranging from 20.12 to 0.71, while Stroud et al described one listener with 'almost perfect' intra-rater reliability. Such findings of superior consistency in listening performance lead one to speculate that close listening for perceptual rating purposes may be susceptible to the effects of training once standards have been established.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar phenomenon has been reported in two studies of the application of cervical auscultation in determining the sounds of swallowing, with certain individuals proving much more consistent in their responses than their peers. 47,48 Leslie and colleagues reported intra-rater k values ranging from 20.12 to 0.71, while Stroud et al described one listener with 'almost perfect' intra-rater reliability. Such findings of superior consistency in listening performance lead one to speculate that close listening for perceptual rating purposes may be susceptible to the effects of training once standards have been established.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors also point that the best site for positioning the stethoscope would be the lateral neck, above the cricoid cartilage, in front of the sternocleidomastoid muscle and the large vessels. 13,18,22 . A study investigated the best cervical site to perform auscultation.…”
Section: Cervical Auscultationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leslei (27) verified poor agreement between cervical auscultation and videofluoroscopy, and the standardization and validation were made difficult to few studies and professionals considered trustworthy in the detention and adequate classification of the sounds of the swallowing.…”
Section: Correlation Between Clinical Speech-language Pathology and Vmentioning
confidence: 99%