2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102587
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relevant, or irrelevant, external factors in panic buying

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fear of lockdowns, panic buying, increased peer buying, scarcity of essential items on superstore shelves, disruption of supply chains and individual/household demographics have played a vital role in consumer impulse buying behaviours (Ahmed et al, 2020;Gupta, Nair and Radhakrishnan, 2021;Nam et al, 2021). National contexts and cultures, as well as local circumstances, may also have affected the relative importance of such factors (Messner and Payson, 2021;Prentice et al, 2021). These effects have been demonstrated in the Covid-19 pandemic, where stores quickly sold out of basics.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fear of lockdowns, panic buying, increased peer buying, scarcity of essential items on superstore shelves, disruption of supply chains and individual/household demographics have played a vital role in consumer impulse buying behaviours (Ahmed et al, 2020;Gupta, Nair and Radhakrishnan, 2021;Nam et al, 2021). National contexts and cultures, as well as local circumstances, may also have affected the relative importance of such factors (Messner and Payson, 2021;Prentice et al, 2021). These effects have been demonstrated in the Covid-19 pandemic, where stores quickly sold out of basics.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the COVID‐19‐induced behaviours that were studied include consumption shifts (Kansiime et al., 2021 ; Pakravan‐Charvadeh et al., 2021 ), impulsive buying (Naeem, 2020 ), stockpiling, and panic buying (Billore & Anisimova, 2021 ; Keane & Neal, 2021 ; Naeem, 2020 ; Prentice et al., 2021 ), product and brand substitution (Knowles et al., 2020 ), and shifts in channel preferences (Mehrolia et al., 2021 ; Pantano et al., 2020 ). Researchers have attributed such behaviour to COVID‐19‐induced impacts on consumers' socio‐economic status, changing way of life, and influence on predisposed beliefs (Milaković, 2021 ), changes in the consumers' buying environment such as stockouts, supply and demand disruptions (Prentice et al, 2021 ), and external stimuli such as information and social media exposure. (Laato et al., 2020 ; Naeem, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prentice et al(2020) examined and confirmed the connection between the time between government measures and panic buying in Australia. Prentice, Nguyen, et al(2021) explored the impact on panic purchases of external factors such as government intervention and support to combat and manage the pandemic, business intervention and support to prevent hoarding or lack of stokes, and the influence of different categories of social groups that may influence panic purchases and how they are related. Based on data from five countries (Australia, India, China, Vietnam, and Indonesia), Prentice, Nguyen, et al(2021) showed that government and business interventions and support influenced the increase of panic buying, while social groups did not reveal this effect.…”
Section: Cluster 4: Panic Buyingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Baran, 2021;Campbell, Inman, Kirmani, & Price, 2020;Finsterwalder, Kabadayi, Fisk, & Boenigk, 2021;Giroux et al, 2021;Gordon-Wilson, 2021;Itani & Hollebeek, 2021;Kim, Yang, Min, & White, 2021;Kirk & Rifkin, 2020;Lim, 2021;Milakovic, 2021;Nayal, Pandey, & Paul, 2021;Nofiani, Indarti, Lukito- Budi, & Manik, 2021;Racat, Capelli, & Lichy, 2021;Toubes, Araujo Vila, & Fraiz Brea, 2021;Zwanka & Buff, 2021). (Ardanza-Ruiz & Lavin, 2021; Baarsma & Groenewegen, 2021; Cox et al, 2020; do Amaral Moretti, da Silva Gabriel, do Prado, & Alcantara Fagundes, 2021; Ellison, McFadden, Rickard, & Wilson, 2021; Goolsbee & Syverson, 2021; Gupta, Simon, & Wing, 2020; Im, Kim, & Choeh, 2021; Pantano et al, 2020; Pantano, Priporas, Devereux, & Pizzi, 2021; Paul, Menzies, Zutshi, & Cai, 2020; Rejeb,Rejeb, & Keogh, 2020;Safara, 2021;Veselovska, Zavadsky, & Bartkova, 2021;Zhang, Liu, & Yao, 2021) (Barnes, Diaz, & Arnaboldi, 2021;Billore & Anisimova, 2021;Garner, Safir, & Schild, 2020;Hall, Fieger, Prayag, & Dyason, 2021;Kaur & Malik, 2021;Kazancoglu & Demir, 2021;Loxton et al, 2020;Musyaffi, Sari, & Respati, 2021;Oana, 2020;Pham et al, 2020;Prentice, Chen, & Stantic, 2020;Prentice, Nguyen, et al, 2021;Prentice, Quach, & Thaichon, 2021;Tan, Sia, & Tang, 2021)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%