2002
DOI: 10.1063/1.1459100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relaxation of a strained quantum well at a cleaved surface

Abstract: Scanning probe microscopy of a cleaved semiconductor surface provides a direct measurement of the elastic field of buried, strained structures such as quantum wells or dots, but allowance must be made for relaxation at the surface. We have calculated this relaxation analytically for the exposed edge of a strained quantum well within classical elastic theory for a linear, isotropic, homogeneous medium. The surface bulges outward if the quantum well has a larger natural lattice constant and the dilation changes … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9 for the outward relaxation of a quantum well, which assumes that the elastic response is linear and isotropic. The WL was modeled including the effect of the asymmetric As profile, which is likely created during the switching between phosphorus to arsenic flux or by As carryover.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 for the outward relaxation of a quantum well, which assumes that the elastic response is linear and isotropic. The WL was modeled including the effect of the asymmetric As profile, which is likely created during the switching between phosphorus to arsenic flux or by As carryover.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The indium segregation profile of the WLs can be simply described by the phenomenological model of Muraki et al described in the previous section [27,31]. Based on this model, we calculated the outward relaxation of the WLs using the analytical expressions by Davies et al [24]. The optimal fit to the experimental relaxation profiles was obtained with N= (1.9 ± 0.1)ML, R = 0.79 ± 0.03 and N = (1.9 ± 0.1)ML, R = 0.78 ± 0.03 for the InAs WLs in GaAs and AlAs, respectively, where N is the total amount of deposited In and R the segregation coefficient.…”
Section: Figure 515 Calculated and Measured Relaxation Profiles Thromentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measured outward displacement and strain (measured by the change in lattice spacing) can be used to determine the indium composition of a strained (In,Ga) As nanostructure, by comparing the experimental data with the calculated relaxation and strain using elasticity theory [24]. In the case of quantum wells with a low concentration of indium (<30%), or wetting layers, the indium distribution can also be obtained directly by counting the indium atoms, as will be shown in the next sections.…”
Section: Figure 54 Strain Relaxation At the Cleaved Surface Of A Strmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations