2009
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relative time sharing: new findings and an extension of the resource allocation model of temporal processing

Abstract: Individuals time as if using a stopwatch that can be stopped or reset on command. Here, we review behavioural and neurobiological data supporting the time-sharing hypothesis that perceived time depends on the attentional and memory resources allocated to the timing process. Neuroimaging studies in humans suggest that timekeeping tasks engage brain circuits typically involved in attention and working memory. Behavioural, pharmacological, lesion and electrophysiological studies in lower animals support this time… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
163
0
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(182 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
8
163
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Evidence suggests that during mind wandering, one's attention is coupled to task-independent thoughts and concomitantly dissociated from perceptual input, resulting in an attenuation of sensory processing (perceptual decoupling; (Barron, Riby, Greer, & Smallwood, 2011;Smallwood, Beach, Schooler, & Handy, 2008). The magnitude of processing resources directed to a timed interval is related to its perceived duration such that greater, or lesser, allocation of resources is associated with temporal dilation, or contraction, respectively (Berry, Li, Lin, & Lustig, 2014;Buhusi & Meck, 2009). The association between perceived duration and resource allocation suggests that perceptual decoupling during mind wandering states will lead to distortions in interval timing.…”
Section: Public Significance Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence suggests that during mind wandering, one's attention is coupled to task-independent thoughts and concomitantly dissociated from perceptual input, resulting in an attenuation of sensory processing (perceptual decoupling; (Barron, Riby, Greer, & Smallwood, 2011;Smallwood, Beach, Schooler, & Handy, 2008). The magnitude of processing resources directed to a timed interval is related to its perceived duration such that greater, or lesser, allocation of resources is associated with temporal dilation, or contraction, respectively (Berry, Li, Lin, & Lustig, 2014;Buhusi & Meck, 2009). The association between perceived duration and resource allocation suggests that perceptual decoupling during mind wandering states will lead to distortions in interval timing.…”
Section: Public Significance Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The involvement of attention mechanisms is a fundamental issue in contemporary research on timing and time perception (Brown & Boltz, 2002;Buhusi & Meck, 2009;Burle & Casini, 2001;Hemmes, Brown, & Kladopoulos, 2004). Although the variability of estimates is sometimes argued to depend on attention, the role of attention is most commonly used for explaining the perceived duration of involving, for instance, a series of partially overlapping visual displays marking intervals of different lengths that had to be timed for eventual reproduction.…”
Section: Attentionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In internal clock models, similar to a stop watch, a pacemaker produces a series of pulses and the number of pulses recorded over a given time span represents subjective duration (Church 1984;Treisman et al 1990;Zakay & Block 1997). Testing a variant of these model types with rats and using a specific task (the peak interval procedure), Buhusi & Meck (2009) show the importance of allocating attention to time as opposed to the situation when subjects are distracted from time. The authors do note that the cognitive time sharing hypothesis finding empirical support in their experiments can be applied to any neuronal model of time perception.…”
Section: Overview Of the Theme Issuementioning
confidence: 99%