2010
DOI: 10.3758/app.72.3.561
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Timing and time perception: A review of recent behavioral and neuroscience findings and theoretical directions

Abstract: Suppose someone had to prepare a review article on visual perception, instead of time perception. This individual would probably ask for a series of reviews, with at least one-and probably several-dedicated to color, distance, shape, and motion perception, and maybe to other aspects of visual perception. It would be very difficult to complete the same exercise for time perception since the categories of temporal experiences are not as clearly defined. However, for a reader to understand the scope of a text on … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

31
670
3
32

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 803 publications
(742 citation statements)
references
References 271 publications
31
670
3
32
Order By: Relevance
“…Time is inferred from the number of pulses registered by the accumulator. It is an ongoing debate whether the human time-keeping system might consist of a single pacemaker-accumulator mechanisms or whether multiple pacemakers and accumulators might exist that are used depending on the tasks at hand (see Grondin, 2010, for example). For different time scales, for example, such as milliseconds, seconds to hours, or circadian cycles, previous research suggests that several internal clocks exist that differ from each other in their timekeeping properties (see Buhusi & Meck, 2009;Ivry & Schlerf, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Time is inferred from the number of pulses registered by the accumulator. It is an ongoing debate whether the human time-keeping system might consist of a single pacemaker-accumulator mechanisms or whether multiple pacemakers and accumulators might exist that are used depending on the tasks at hand (see Grondin, 2010, for example). For different time scales, for example, such as milliseconds, seconds to hours, or circadian cycles, previous research suggests that several internal clocks exist that differ from each other in their timekeeping properties (see Buhusi & Meck, 2009;Ivry & Schlerf, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the duration until the user perceives a freeze and reacts to it has not been studied within the scope of QoE. This is important to know as QoE assessment depends on multidisciplinary parameters such as time perception and "inner-clock" [14] of the user. Musser [39] states that the human consciousness lags 80 ms behind the actual events.…”
Section: User Response Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studying the time it takes for a user to react (to press the "Freeze" button) to a freeze event, is complex and depends on many factors. The authors of [14] studied the time perception in depths, and state that the actual time is different than the subjectively perceived time. However, in this study, we assume that the users indicate a freeze as they perceive it on spot.…”
Section: User Response Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, there are basically two categories of perceptual time models, depending on whether timing is seen as the output of a dedicated system. Grondin provides a good overview of these models in his literature review about timing and time perception [9], as summarized in Table 1. Pacemaker-counter models…”
Section: Perceptual Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It involves the ability of retrospective timing and focuses on the estimation of past actions based on temporal judgement. This is based on short momentum in seconds or minutes [9].…”
Section: Perceptual Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%