2003
DOI: 10.1037/0022-0167.50.4.458
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relation of contextual supports and barriers to choice behavior in engineering majors: Test of alternative social cognitive models.

Abstract: posit somewhat different relations between contextual variables and choice actions. The authors tested the predictions of these 2 model variations. Participants (328 students in an introductory engineering course) completed measures of SCCT's person (self-efficacy, coping efficacy, outcome expectations, interests, academic goals) and contextual variables (environmental supports and barriers) related to the pursuit of engineering majors. Findings indicated good support for a model portraying contextual supports… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

42
682
10
37

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 505 publications
(778 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
42
682
10
37
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding research outcomes expectations, which involve beliefs about the outcomes of various courses of action (Lent, Brown, Schmidt, Brenner, & Treistman, 2003), we found that several participants had positive outcome expectations of using research. For instance, some said that research utilization would help build stronger communities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Regarding research outcomes expectations, which involve beliefs about the outcomes of various courses of action (Lent, Brown, Schmidt, Brenner, & Treistman, 2003), we found that several participants had positive outcome expectations of using research. For instance, some said that research utilization would help build stronger communities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Self efficacy has been found significant variable and value of exp (B) highlights that students with high self efficacy are almost thirty four times more likely to go for higher education as compared to students with low self efficacy. Literature in the context of the present finding highlights that self-efficacy expectations have consistently been found to directly affect career and educational intentions (Fouad & Smith, 1996), as well as interests and goals (Lent et al, 2003;Nauta & Epperson, 2003). Relative functionalism has been found significant variable and value of exp (B) highlights that students with high relative functionalism are almost thirty five times more likely to go for higher education as compared to students with low relative functionalism.…”
Section: Determinants Of Going For Higher Educationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…39 Des recherches actuelles mettent en évidence le rôle de la perception d'obstacles et de soutien social dans les processus de choix professionnels (Lent et al, 2000;Lent et al, 2003). Lent et al (2000, p.41) We present results that show that academic self-efficacy of French students is linked with their academic achievement.…”
Section: Image1unclassified