Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0
21

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
34
0
21
Order By: Relevance
“…Spider species were categorized in guilds following Dias et al (2010), who established the most common guilds in three major Neotropical ecosystems. This categorization is based on web use (presence/absence of web foraging behavior), type of web (sheet, spatial, orb), foraging manner (ambusher, stalker, active runner), micro-habitat use (ground, vegetation), and diel activity (diurnal, nocturnal).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Spider species were categorized in guilds following Dias et al (2010), who established the most common guilds in three major Neotropical ecosystems. This categorization is based on web use (presence/absence of web foraging behavior), type of web (sheet, spatial, orb), foraging manner (ambusher, stalker, active runner), micro-habitat use (ground, vegetation), and diel activity (diurnal, nocturnal).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison of the abundance of adult spider species collected with pitfall traps on Fernando de Noronha Island between preserved and disturbed areas and between seasons, according to collecting site and season. Dias et al (2010).…”
Section: Implications For Conservationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Juvenile spiders were identified at the family level, while adult spiders could be identified further to a species or morphospecies level. Procedures described in Dias et al (2010), Höfer & Brescovit (2001), and Uetz et al (1999) were adopted in the identification of the behavioral guilds. The reference material is deposited at LECZ, with duplicates in the Arachnida and Myriapoda Collection of ABAM.…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We classified all the spiders in families and, based on family affiliation, in two different major foraging strategies: webbuilding (the ones that must anchor their hunting webs to the substrate) and hunting predators (the ones that actively pursue or use a sit-and-wait strategy for prey capture, not using webs to trap prey). To classify the groups, we checked Dias et al (2010) and Cardoso et al (2011).…”
Section: Study Area a Slash Pine Stand Of Pinus Elliottiimentioning
confidence: 99%