2016 International Conference on Informatics and Computing (ICIC) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/iac.2016.7905732
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-time activity recognition in mobile phones based on its accelerometer data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example point 6 (the palm of the right hand) have three shapes which means some of the studies were used in this position for classification human activities by using three devices that are described in the following: a) A red circle contains (A): Smartphone was used for sensing the accelerometer data in the reference [26] and [27]. The reference [26] used NB and KNN for classification human activities but the reference [27] used logitBoost classifier. b) A red circle contains (A and G): Smartphone was used to collect Accelerometer and Gyroscope data for classifying human activities.…”
Section: B Online Vs Offline Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example point 6 (the palm of the right hand) have three shapes which means some of the studies were used in this position for classification human activities by using three devices that are described in the following: a) A red circle contains (A): Smartphone was used for sensing the accelerometer data in the reference [26] and [27]. The reference [26] used NB and KNN for classification human activities but the reference [27] used logitBoost classifier. b) A red circle contains (A and G): Smartphone was used to collect Accelerometer and Gyroscope data for classifying human activities.…”
Section: B Online Vs Offline Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By investigating 48 different research, it is found 56.25% of researches focused on using traditional algorithms for classification, some of those researches adapting the traditional algorithm for achieving high accuracy, 33.33% using deep learning, and 10.4% using algorithms (deep learning or/and traditional) for examining their proposed system but they didn't focus on the algorithm such as in [33] [26]. Maekawa et al [33] compared two traditional algorithms, AdaBoost and DT, for examining the efficiency of classifier when collecting the data from heterogeneous sensors.…”
Section: Traditional and Deep Learning Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the past several years, as mobile devices (MDs) such as smartphones, handheld game consoles, and vehicle multimedia computers have become virtually ubiquitous, an increasing number of new mobile applications such as augmented reality, image processing, natural language processing, face recognition, and interactive gaming have emerged and become the focus of considerable attention [1,2]. ese types of mobile applications are typically latency-sensitive, demand intensive computation, and have high-energy consumption characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the representations and their corresponding labels are used to train a classifier to separate various activities given the differences in the sensor data. Human activity recognition (HAR) is an active research domain along AAR, and the overlap is mainly on the type of sensors being considered and the underlying ML techniques [10]. In Section 2.3, we discuss the overlap and differences in more detail.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%