1977
DOI: 10.1016/0147-7552(77)90041-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ratio data and the quantification of drug effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditionally, cotinine and other urinary biomarkers have been studied as a ratio to CR in correlation or regression analysis. However, dependent biological variables standardized by a denominator have unusual statistical properties which have decreased precision and sensitivity when compared to models where the denominator is treated as an independent variable (Anderson & Lydic 1997). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, cotinine and other urinary biomarkers have been studied as a ratio to CR in correlation or regression analysis. However, dependent biological variables standardized by a denominator have unusual statistical properties which have decreased precision and sensitivity when compared to models where the denominator is treated as an independent variable (Anderson & Lydic 1997). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A covariance procedure (univariate analysis of covariance; Wildt and Ahtola 1978) was used to assess significance of groups, controlling for basal differences in level of responding to vehicle. Analysis of covariance has been suggested as an alternative to more traditional analysis of variance of percentage transformed data, is more defensible upon statistical grounds (Anderson and Lydic 1977), and is considered a more sensitive indicator of main effects. It should be noted that all assumptions for analysis of variance models are also required for covariance analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Dependent biological variables standardized by a denominator (here, uCR) generally tend to present unusual statistical properties, potentially impairing the sensitivity and precision of a marker. 11,16 Figure 1a/b: Relationship between uCR and TWuAs in linear and power functional regression analysis (PFRA). Subset of all samples < 40 µg/L TWuAs (n=4854) for uncorrected (1a) and conventionally CR corrected (1b) TWuAs.…”
Section: Pitfalls In Conventional Creatinine Correction (Ccrc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Dependent biological variables standardized by a denominator (here, uCR) generally tend to present unusual statistical properties, potentially impairing the sensitivity and precision of a marker. 11,16…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%