2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.coal.2019.103336
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid quantification of lignite sulfur content: Combining optical and X-ray approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The samples were dried at 20 °C until at constant weight, then ground to fine powder with an agate mortar and a pestle. Samples were massed to infinite thickness on a Prolene thin film placed directly over the instrument aperture mounted in a portable test stand configuration [ 64 ]. The instrument was initialized with a 316 stainless steel alloy and operated on line power (115 VAC) at 10–40 keV for 45 s/beam in Geochem Mode .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The samples were dried at 20 °C until at constant weight, then ground to fine powder with an agate mortar and a pestle. Samples were massed to infinite thickness on a Prolene thin film placed directly over the instrument aperture mounted in a portable test stand configuration [ 64 ]. The instrument was initialized with a 316 stainless steel alloy and operated on line power (115 VAC) at 10–40 keV for 45 s/beam in Geochem Mode .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morgan et al (Morgan et al, 2009) used the last ones for the forecast of SOC in their works. The combined use of XRF and NixPro, described in a number of works (Morgan et al, 2009;Kagiliery et al, 2019;, makes it possible to obtain a model with an accuracy of R 2 = 0.81. In general, the authors conclude that NixPro in combination with additional soil predictors -texture, clay content, etc., is a fairly reliable tool in addressing the above issues (Zhu et al, 2011;Swetha R. K. & Chakraborty, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For in-field applications, further studies are still needed to assess the other factors that can influence the pXRF results, such as water content, anatomy of leaves, cellulose, and lignin contents. Additionally, the nutritional status should be assessed combining pXRF with other proximal sensors (e.g., Vis-NIR, NixPro), as such techniques have been proven to enhance predictive models in coal and soils [68,69]. Especially for crops in which foliar fertilization is necessary, the pXRF can be a useful tool for decision-making.…”
Section: Correlation Between Pxrf and Ad For Each Cropmentioning
confidence: 99%