2007
DOI: 10.2527/jas.2006-647
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Random regression model of growth during the first three months of age in Spanish Merino sheep1,2

Abstract: A total of 88,727 individual BW records of Spanish Merino lambs, obtained from 30,214 animals between 2 and 92 d of age, were analyzed using a random regression model (RRM). These animals were progeny of 546 rams and 15,586 ewes raised in 30 flocks, between 1992 and 2002, with a total of 45,941 animals in the pedigree. The contemporary groups (animals of the same flock, year, and season, with 452 levels), the lambing number (11 levels), the combination sex of lambs with type of litter (4 levels), and a fixed r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results demonstrated in this studies that a large proportion of the total variance (56-68% and 80-94%, by homogeneous and heterogeneous residual variances, Table 4 and 5) explained by the first eigenfunction of each covariance function for each random effect. These results was in accordance with other reports (BARAZANDEH et al, 2012;BOHLOULI et al, 2013;MOLINA et al, 2007;ABEGAZ et al, 2010;KARIUKI et al, 2010). This implies that changes in the growth curve would be more likely achieved by selection based on this constant term (BOHLOULI et al, 2013;KARIUKI et al, 2010).…”
Section: Regression Coefficients and Variance Componentsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results demonstrated in this studies that a large proportion of the total variance (56-68% and 80-94%, by homogeneous and heterogeneous residual variances, Table 4 and 5) explained by the first eigenfunction of each covariance function for each random effect. These results was in accordance with other reports (BARAZANDEH et al, 2012;BOHLOULI et al, 2013;MOLINA et al, 2007;ABEGAZ et al, 2010;KARIUKI et al, 2010). This implies that changes in the growth curve would be more likely achieved by selection based on this constant term (BOHLOULI et al, 2013;KARIUKI et al, 2010).…”
Section: Regression Coefficients and Variance Componentsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…There are two important recommendation method for genetic evaluation of growth in sheep: fitting nonlinear regression (e.g. logistic, exponential, Gompertz or Richards models) to the data and estimating genetic parameters for growth curves (LAMBE et al, 2006) or using random regression model (RRM) (LEWIS and BROTHERSTONE, 2002;FISCHER et al, 2004;MOLINA et al, 2007). Currently RRM is being applied for genetic evaluation in growth trait such cattle (KREJCOVA et al, 2007;NESER et al, 2012;BOHLOULI et al, 2013), sheep (LEWIS and BROTHERSTON, 2002;GHAFOURI KESBI et al, 2008;ABEGAZ et al, 2010;KARIUKI et al, 2010;WOLC et al, 2011 ) and pig (HUISMAN et al, 2002) data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molina et al . () identified in the Merino sheep by RRM a substantial genetic variation, not only in the general breeding values but also in the shape of the lamb growth curve. Such an analysis will therefore provide more information to breeders in selecting animals that better fulfil the market requirements in slaughter age and weight.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In meat sheep, studies have been conducted to evaluate the order of fit required for continuous functions applied to random regression models, as developed by Lewis and Brotherstone (2002), Fischer et al (2004), Sarmento et al (2006a), Molina et al (2007), and Sarmento et al (2010), and these differ in the order of fit of the functions adopted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%