2020
DOI: 10.1002/admt.202000915
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quasi‐Nonvolatile Silicon Memory Device

Abstract: Several attempts have been made to store charges in the channel regions of silicon transistors, such as in zero-capacitor random-access memories (Z-RAMs), [7,8] metastable DRAMs (MSDRAMs), [9,10] advanced RAMs (A-RAMs), [11,12] and zeroslope and zero-impact ionization RAMs (Z 2-RAMs). [13,14] Among these, Z 2-RAMs are capable of low-voltage operation with high speed, long retention time, and nondestructive reading capability, because of the positive feedback loop. [15] However, electrostatic doping induced by … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
55
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the p -FBFET (or n -FBFET) changes to an on-state under a V GS of − 1 V (or 1 V). During hold operation under no-bias conditions, the accumulated charge carriers in the potential wells are maintained until the potential barriers in the channels are well-defined, and the FBFETs have quasi-nonvolatile memory characteristics 38 , 39 . In the V GS positive (or negative) sweep for the p -FBFET (or n -FBFET), the charge carriers accumulated in the channel regions are reduced, and the two potential barriers are regenerated.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the p -FBFET (or n -FBFET) changes to an on-state under a V GS of − 1 V (or 1 V). During hold operation under no-bias conditions, the accumulated charge carriers in the potential wells are maintained until the potential barriers in the channels are well-defined, and the FBFETs have quasi-nonvolatile memory characteristics 38 , 39 . In the V GS positive (or negative) sweep for the p -FBFET (or n -FBFET), the charge carriers accumulated in the channel regions are reduced, and the two potential barriers are regenerated.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its long retention time (over 10 4 s) is 1.5 × 10 5 times and 100 times longer than that of DRAMs and the reported quasi‐nonvolatile memories, respectively. [ 3,14–16 ] The ultrahigh operation speed (8 ns) of our memory is ≈10 4 times and 10 6 times faster than that of the commercial NAND/NOR flash memories and the nonvolatile memories based on 2D materials, respectively. [ 5,23,43,44 ] Given the retention time of the device (10 4 s) is still far from the requirement of memory applications, in which more than 10 years’ retention is favorable, one of the potential applications of the memory device is RAMs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 1,3,5 ] To break the limitation of “memory wall,” great efforts have been paid to develop ultrafast nonvolatile memory with ultrahigh operation speed, long‐term retention, and low power consumption. [ 6–13 ] For instance, quasi‐nonvolatile memories based on a semi‐floating‐gate architecture were proposed recently, [ 3,14–16 ] which can fill the timescale gap between volatile and nonvolatile memories. However, the retention time of these quasi‐nonvolatile memories are still limited (<100 s), and a relatively high gate voltage is required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reliably simulate the Si-based 3-T TRAM, the physics models of the simulation are adjusted by using the experimental data of I A -V AC characteristics for various V GC s in the p + -n-p-n + silicon memory device with a gated base (Fig. 2) [20]. Speci cally, the parameters of the recombination model are adjusted and the Si-SiO 2 surface SRH recombination model is adopted to re ect the data retention characteristics of real devices affected by junction and interface defects.…”
Section: Simulation Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%