Quantifying the Ancillary Benefits of the Representative Concentration Pathways on Air Quality in Europe

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use: Documents in EconStor may SummaryThis paper presents estimates of the economic benefit of air quality improvements in Europe that occur as a side effect of GHG emission reductions. We consider three climate policy scenarios that reach radiative forcing levels in 2100 of three Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs). These targets are achieved by introducing a global uniform tax on all GHG emissions in the Integrated Assessment Model WITCH, assuming both full as well as limited technological flexibility. The resulting consumption patterns of fossil fuels are used to estimate the physical impacts and the economic benefits of pollution reductions on human health and on key assets by implementing the most advanced version of the ExternE methodology with its Impact Pathway Analysis. We find that the mitigation scenario compatible with +2°C reduces total pollution costs in Europe by 76%. Discounted ancillary benefits are more than €2.5 trillion between 2015 and 2100. The monetary value of reduced pollution is equal to €22 per abated ton of CO2 in Europe. Less strict climate policy scenarios generate overall smaller, but still considerable, local benefits (14 € or 18 € per abated ton of CO2). Without discounting, the ancillary benefits are in a range of €36 to €50 per ton of CO2 abated. Cumulative ancillary benefits exceed the cumulative additional cost of electricity generation in Europe. Each European country alone would be better off if the mitigation policy was implemented, although the local benefits in absolute terms vary significantly across the countries. We can identify the relative losers and winners of ancillary benefits in Europe. In particular, we find that large European countries contribute to as much as they benefit from ancillary benefits. The scenarios with limited technology flexibility do deliver results that are similar to the full technology flexibility scenario. Keywords AbstractThis paper presents estimates of the economic benefit of air quality improvements in Europe that occur as a side effect of GHG emission reductions. We consider three climate policy scenarios that reach radiative forcing levels in 2100 of three Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs). These targets are achieved by introducing a global uniform tax on all GHG emissions in the Integrated Assessment Model WITCH, assuming both full as well as limited technological flexibility. The resulting consumption patterns of fossil fuels are used to estima...

The simple arithmetic of carbon pricing and stranded assets

“…In recent estimates of the non-climaterelated health benefits of abandoning fossil fuels (e.g. Parry et al 2014;Thompson et al 2014;West et al 2013;Ščasný et al 2015), the effects of uncertainty about the steepness of climate damages (Crost and Traeger 2014) and the potential of multiple abrupt disruptions in the climate system (Cai et al 2016;Lemoine and Traeger 2016) provide ample reasons for raising the carbon price.…”

The Health Costs of Revised Coal Mining Limits in Northern Bohemia

“…Considerable empirical evidence shows that valuation of health (i.e., willingness-to-pay) rises with income. As future income is unknown, we use as a proxy GDP growth for the 2015-2050 period from the integrated assessment World Induced Technical Change Hybrid (WITCH) model [35,36]. The WITCH model estimated GDP endogenously for 13 regions of the world assuming that economic growth follows the trajectory of greenhouse gas emissions evolving according to the Representative Concentration Pathways (RCP) mitigation scenario 4.5.…”

Impacts of Reclassified Brown Coal Reserves on the Energy System and Deep Decarbonisation Target in the Czech Republic

“…The IPA comprises four basic steps: (i) selection of the reference power plant and determination of harmful emissions releases; (ii) calculation of changes in pollutant concentrations for all affected regions using atmospheric dispersion models; (iii) estimation of physical impacts from exposure using concentration-response functions; and (iv) economic valuation of impacts. The IPA covers a range of impacts on human health, buildings and materials, biodiversity, and crop yields (see [33] for a detailed description).…”

“…First, the same value of damage over the entire period is assumed. Alternatively, the willingness to pay values for avoiding the adverse effects and hence value of damage may be time variant and likely grow over time as real consumption will grow, as assumed, for instance, in Ščasný et al [33] (following the approach described in [33] and assuming 3, 2, and 1 per cent growth in real consumption before 2015, during 2015-2030, and after 2030, respectively, we get qualitatively similar results as when no price adjustment is made. In absolute terms, cumulative value of the external costs is about 45% higher with the adjustments.…”