Abstract:Brown coal has been the major source of energy for more than 150 years for the Czech economy, but its role in the coming decades is nowadays the source of heated debate. Many of the recurring discussions address the coal reserves that were set aside in 1991 in order to halt the massive destruction of the landscape and the unprecedented deterioration of the human environment in Northern Bohemia. We study the proposed variants of the revised mining limits using the impact-pathway approach in order to quantify an… Show more
“…A major part of damage for each of the four pollutant categories is responsible for adverse health impacts, 90% SO 2 , 79% for NO x , 99% for PM 2.5 and PM coarse . Impacts on biodiversity contribute by 5%, 15%, for SO 2 and NO x , respectively, and materials effects comprise 6%, 1%, for SO 2 and NO x , respectively.…”
Section: Quantification Of Damagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other two considered TEL variants would constitute a total of 167 Mt (2540 PJ) or even 269 Mt (4280 PJ) of newly accessible brown coal under TEL3 and TEL4, respectively; see Figure 1, more details in [2]. The use of newly accessible brown coal reserves may result not only in a higher share of brown coal in the fossil fuel mix, but it could also have an impact on the deployment of renewable resources and other non-fossil technologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This would be in sharp contrast with the current EU energy-climate policy, which calls for a reduction in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and coal usage, and an increase in the share of renewable energy sources (RES) in final energy consumption (The 20-20-20 target to be achieved at the EU level by 2020 has been updated by setting the EU commitment at 40-27-27 target by 2030 [3], which was integrated into the EU 2050 Roadmap for moving to a competitive low-carbon economy [4] which requires reducing greenhouse gases emissions to 80% below the 1990 level by 2050. The 40-27-27 target specifically includes: (1) reduction of the EU's GHG emissions by at least 40% relative to the 1990 level; (2) an increase in the share of renewables to at least 27% of the EU's final energy consumption; and (3) an increase in energy efficiency by at least 27%. These new 2030 EU targets will be accompanied by the reform of the EU Emission Trading System and by a package of measures to achieve a competitive, affordable, secure, and sustainable energy supply for the EU [5]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Máca and Melichar [2] quantified the health effects of airborne emissions from coal mining and the use of extracted coal in all TEL variants, as assumed by the Czech Government, but they did not analyse the impacts on the energy system and hence emissions attributable to optimized energy mix. This paper applies a new extended Integrated Markal Efom System of the Czech Republic (TIMES-CZ) covering the whole energy sector to assess the impacts of all four policy options in question.…”
Abstract:In 2015, a 24-year-long prohibition of coal mining within some territories in the North Bohemia coal basin was lifted and as a consequence mining a part of the brown coal reserves might well be resumed. This paper analyses the impacts of maintaining the ban versus three options for a less environmentally stringent policy on the Czech energy system; fuel-and technology-mix, the costs of generating energy, emissions and related external costs up to 2050. We find that overall the effect of lifting the ban, on coal usage, air pollutant emissions and hence externalities is rather small, up to 1-2% compared to the level of keeping the ban. The small difference in the impacts remains even if changes in the prices of fossil fuels and European Emission Allowances or different development in nuclear power usage are assumed. In fact, changing these assumptions will result in more pronounced differences in the impacts than the four policy options might deliver. Maintaining the ban would not achieve the European Energy Roadmap 2050 target and the newly adopted policy and the other two counter-environmental proposals would miss the 80% reduction target to an even greater degree. The environmental and external health costs attributable to emissions of local air pollutants stemming from power generation are in a range of €26-32 billion over the whole period and decline from about 0.5% of gross domestic product in 2015 to 0.1% in 2050.
“…A major part of damage for each of the four pollutant categories is responsible for adverse health impacts, 90% SO 2 , 79% for NO x , 99% for PM 2.5 and PM coarse . Impacts on biodiversity contribute by 5%, 15%, for SO 2 and NO x , respectively, and materials effects comprise 6%, 1%, for SO 2 and NO x , respectively.…”
Section: Quantification Of Damagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other two considered TEL variants would constitute a total of 167 Mt (2540 PJ) or even 269 Mt (4280 PJ) of newly accessible brown coal under TEL3 and TEL4, respectively; see Figure 1, more details in [2]. The use of newly accessible brown coal reserves may result not only in a higher share of brown coal in the fossil fuel mix, but it could also have an impact on the deployment of renewable resources and other non-fossil technologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This would be in sharp contrast with the current EU energy-climate policy, which calls for a reduction in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and coal usage, and an increase in the share of renewable energy sources (RES) in final energy consumption (The 20-20-20 target to be achieved at the EU level by 2020 has been updated by setting the EU commitment at 40-27-27 target by 2030 [3], which was integrated into the EU 2050 Roadmap for moving to a competitive low-carbon economy [4] which requires reducing greenhouse gases emissions to 80% below the 1990 level by 2050. The 40-27-27 target specifically includes: (1) reduction of the EU's GHG emissions by at least 40% relative to the 1990 level; (2) an increase in the share of renewables to at least 27% of the EU's final energy consumption; and (3) an increase in energy efficiency by at least 27%. These new 2030 EU targets will be accompanied by the reform of the EU Emission Trading System and by a package of measures to achieve a competitive, affordable, secure, and sustainable energy supply for the EU [5]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Máca and Melichar [2] quantified the health effects of airborne emissions from coal mining and the use of extracted coal in all TEL variants, as assumed by the Czech Government, but they did not analyse the impacts on the energy system and hence emissions attributable to optimized energy mix. This paper applies a new extended Integrated Markal Efom System of the Czech Republic (TIMES-CZ) covering the whole energy sector to assess the impacts of all four policy options in question.…”
Abstract:In 2015, a 24-year-long prohibition of coal mining within some territories in the North Bohemia coal basin was lifted and as a consequence mining a part of the brown coal reserves might well be resumed. This paper analyses the impacts of maintaining the ban versus three options for a less environmentally stringent policy on the Czech energy system; fuel-and technology-mix, the costs of generating energy, emissions and related external costs up to 2050. We find that overall the effect of lifting the ban, on coal usage, air pollutant emissions and hence externalities is rather small, up to 1-2% compared to the level of keeping the ban. The small difference in the impacts remains even if changes in the prices of fossil fuels and European Emission Allowances or different development in nuclear power usage are assumed. In fact, changing these assumptions will result in more pronounced differences in the impacts than the four policy options might deliver. Maintaining the ban would not achieve the European Energy Roadmap 2050 target and the newly adopted policy and the other two counter-environmental proposals would miss the 80% reduction target to an even greater degree. The environmental and external health costs attributable to emissions of local air pollutants stemming from power generation are in a range of €26-32 billion over the whole period and decline from about 0.5% of gross domestic product in 2015 to 0.1% in 2050.
“…Regular monitoring of air, water, and soil quality enables timely response and prevention of hazardous events [3]. Alignment of production and consumption with the available natural resources plays a significant role in creating the basis for harmonious relations between the energy sector and sustainable development [4].…”
Section: Indicators Of Sustainable Development and Their Application mentioning
Aims and background: Mining and energy complexes in Serbia are recognized as a major source of a large number of pollutants. Serbia's environmental performance reports clearly indicate that large mining and energy complexes are the dominant source of air pollution. It is difficult to determine which of them remarkably threaten the quality of the environment, as all the basic elements of the environment (air, water, and soil) are threatened, not just one. Mining and energy complexes significantly reduce the quality of the immediate environment, as the distance areas throughout water and air pollution propagation. Additional motivation for this study lies in the fact that large mining and energy complexes are particularly interesting because they are located in the immediate vicinity or large rivers (mostly the Danube), which are protected in many national and international legislation acts (particularly the Danube). The basis for the preservation of environmental quality is an effective environmental management system (EMS) in mining and energy complexes. The aim of this study is to promote and elaborate the possibility for improving the mining and energy complex environmental protection/management system by applying the basic principles of sustainable development. Methodology: Project management methodology is selected as a tool. Project management is based on the application of a network planning technique (Critical Path Method), because of its suitability for representing the logical structure of environmental protection system. The survey was conducted in the area of the city of Kostolac. The examined area included mining and energy complexes in Kostolac, which incorporate three surface mines (Ćirikovac, Klenovik, and Drmno) and two thermal power stations (TE "Kostolac A" (100 MW) and TE "Kostolac B" (2 × 348.5 MW)). The PSR model (Pressures, State, Response) was used for the organization of the interactions within "society-environment" system as the basis for indicator selection. Results: Procedures to identify and determine the significance of the environmental aspects should be established by executive staff in mining and energy plants and complexes. Identification of environmental aspects is the first part of the planning system of environmental management and the activities related to them. The accomplishment of critical path activities represents the basis for improving the environmental protection system in mining and energy complexes. Discussion: Application of sustainable development principles depends on the country's energy potential and the application of the adopted environmental policy regarding mining and energy complexes. Strict enforcement of existing laws and regulations presents an opportunity to rectify many shortcomings while providing economic benefits, restoring the usable value of ravaged land, and preserving air and water quality.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.