2019
DOI: 10.5530/ijpi.2019.3.24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality Standards and Antioxidant Activity of Siddha Formulation Cuvacakutori Chooranam

Abstract: Objectives: To evaluate quality standards and to screen antioxidant activity of Cuvacakutori Chooranam (CC) a poly herbomineral Siddha formulation. Methods: The drug was prepared with authenticated ingredients. Powder microscopic, phytochemical, physicochemical, HPTLC fingerprint profiling (n-hexane, successive chloroform, successive ethanol), total phenol and flavonoid estimation, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) free radical scavenging and superoxide scavenging activities of CC were studied. Results: Mic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4) of revealed 11 peaks with Rf 0.01 (area 13.59%), 0.09 (2.54%), 0.14 (0.48%), 0.17 (0.95%), 0.24 (3.96%), 0.26 (6.23%), 0.34 (0.71%), 0.52 (22.87%), 0.66 (31.70%),0.70 (13.75%) and 0.79 (3.22%) under short UV; 11 peaks with Rf 0.02 (area 48.05%), 0.08 (3.30%), 0.11 (1.18%), 0.16 (11.53%), 0.20 (1.26%), 0.59 (8.85%), 0.66 (9.52%), 0.67 (9.80%), 0.82 (5.63%), 0.96 (0.35%) and 0.97 (0.51%) under long UV and 12 peaks with Rf 0.01 (area 6.28%), 0.06 (10.88%), 0.12 (22.52%), 0.29 (6.39%), 0. (32)(33)(34).…”
Section: Scanningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4) of revealed 11 peaks with Rf 0.01 (area 13.59%), 0.09 (2.54%), 0.14 (0.48%), 0.17 (0.95%), 0.24 (3.96%), 0.26 (6.23%), 0.34 (0.71%), 0.52 (22.87%), 0.66 (31.70%),0.70 (13.75%) and 0.79 (3.22%) under short UV; 11 peaks with Rf 0.02 (area 48.05%), 0.08 (3.30%), 0.11 (1.18%), 0.16 (11.53%), 0.20 (1.26%), 0.59 (8.85%), 0.66 (9.52%), 0.67 (9.80%), 0.82 (5.63%), 0.96 (0.35%) and 0.97 (0.51%) under long UV and 12 peaks with Rf 0.01 (area 6.28%), 0.06 (10.88%), 0.12 (22.52%), 0.29 (6.39%), 0. (32)(33)(34).…”
Section: Scanningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, study of antioxidants of greater efficacy and lower toxicity was worthy of considerable attention. To evaluate antioxidant effects, there are many efforts spent in establishing relevant detection methods, among which 2,2 0 -azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) diammonium salt radical cation (ABTS), ferric reducing antioxidant potential (FRAP), and 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), reducing power assays, were frequently employed (6)(7)(8)(9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%