Psychological Need Thwarting Scale

Bartholomew, Kimberley J.; Ntoumanis, Nikos; Ryan, Richard; Thøgersen‐Ntoumani, Cecilie

doi:10.1037/t18850-000

Cited by 60 publications

(134 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

107

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In line with the aims of Antecedents and Consequences of Parenting the Role of Needs 19 previous studies on SDT (Bartholomew et al, 2011a;Bartholomew et al, 2011b;Costa, Coppolino, Oliva, 2015;Vansteenkiste & Ryan, 2013), these findings supported the distinction of need frustration and need satisfaction. At the same time, context behaviours that are perceived as thwarting basic needs cannot be equated with behaviours that are perceived as being low on support for basic psychological needs (Bartholomew et al, 2011b;Costa, Soenens, et al, 2015;Vansteenkiste & Ryan, 2013).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 78%

“…Consistent with this reasoning, we found that needs frustration was stronger associated with psychological control (need thwarting behaviours) while needs satisfaction was stronger associated with need support behaviours (autonomy support). Thus, we would suggest that need satisfaction and need frustration not only could predict different outcomes but also could have separate antecedents (Bartholomew et al, 2011a(Bartholomew et al, , 2011bVansteenkiste & Ryan, 2013).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Antecedents and consequences of parental psychological control and autonomy support: The role of psychological basic needs

Costa

Gugliandolo

Barberis

et al. 2018

Journal of Social and Personal Relationships

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 78%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Antecedents and consequences of parental psychological control and autonomy support: The role of psychological basic needs

Costa

Gugliandolo

Barberis

et al. 2018

Journal of Social and Personal Relationships

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The importance of considering both need satisfaction and need frustration is well recognized within SDT (Bartholomew et al, 2011a;Costa et al, 2015). Consequently, the availability of a valid and reliable measure is paramount to help researchers to tap both the negative and positive experiential state that occurs when people perceive their psychological basic need satisfied and frustrated in their life.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychometric Evaluation of the Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction and Frustration Scale (BPNSFS) in Italy

Costa

Ingoglia

Inguglia

et al. 2017

Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:Two studies were conducted to adapt the Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction and Frustration Scale (BPNSFS) to the Italian context. Results suggest that the BPNSFS can be considered a promising instrument in the context of SDT-based research for investigating satisfaction and frustration of the three basic needs in Italy.http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/mecd Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development Psychometric Evaluation of the Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction and Frustration Scale (BPNSFS) in Italy SummaryThe purpose of the present multistudy report was to adapt the Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction and Frustration Scale (BPNSFS) to the Italian context. Two studies were conducted.In Study 1, we investigated the dimensionality, reliability, convergent and discriminant validity of the instrument in a sample of 544 participants (Males = 41%) aged from 16 to 35 years. In Study 2, we replicated the results concerning dimensionality in an independent sample of 502 participants (Males = 42%) aged from 16 to 35 years. Furthermore, we analyzed measurement invariance across gender. Results of both studies showed that comparing a series of competitive factorial models, the six-factor (6-factor) model had the best fit to the data, assessing six different but related dimensions: Autonomy Satisfaction, Autonomy Frustration, Relatedness Satisfaction, Relatedness Frustration, Competence Satisfaction, and Competence Frustration.Moreover, the reliability, convergent and discriminant validity may be considered adequate.Finally, the BPNSFS showed to be invariant across gender. In sum, the BPNSFS can be considered a promising instrument in the context of SDT-based research for investigating satisfaction and frustration of the three basic needs in Italy. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 F o r P e e r R e v i e w Italian Psychometric Evaluation of BPNSFS 2 Self-determination theory (SDT; Deci & Ryan, 1985; Ryan & Deci, 2002) has become a popular framework for examining motivational issues in several contexts (e.g., Costa, Gugliandolo, Barberis, & Larcan, 2014; Ng et al., 2012;Ryan & Deci, 2013;Soenens & Vansteenkiste, 2010). This is not surprising given that the approach to human development proposed within SDT accounts for the nature and function of motivation in conjunction with the psychological foundations from which motives develop. According to Ryan and Deci (2002), motivation varies along a regulatory continuum ranging from more controlled to fully selfdetermined processes, with the latter nurturing positive consequences such as task persistence and eudemonic well-being.Within SDT, a critical issue in the effects of motivation concerns the degree to which people are able to satisfy three universal, innate, and nonhierarchical psychological needs, namely, autonomy, relatedness, and competence. The...

show abstract

“…given context (Bartholomew et al, 2011). This highlights the possibility that some 22 dimensions of perfectionism may predict higher levels of some facets of need satisfaction 23 (e.g., competence), as well as facets of need thwarting (e.g., relatedness).…”

Section: Perfectionistic Striving and Psychological Need Thwartingmentioning

confidence: 98%

“…This 23 includes factorial structure and adequate internal consistency for the six subscales (all α's ≥Psychological need thwarting. Psychological need thwarting was measured using the 1 Psychological Need Thwarting Scale (PNTS; Bartholomew et al, 2011). This includes three, 2 4-item, subscales that assess autonomy thwarting (e.g., "I feel pushed to behave in certain 3 ways in my sport"); competence thwarting (e.g., "Situations occur in my sport in which I am 4 made to feel incapable"); and relatedness thwarting (e.g., "I feel other people involved in my 5 sport dislike me").…”

Section: Participantsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The relationship between multidimensional perfectionism and psychological need thwarting in junior sports participants

Mallinson

Hill

2011

Psychology of Sport and Exercise

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Psychological Need Thwarting Scale

Cited by 60 publications

References 0 publications

Antecedents and consequences of parental psychological control and autonomy support: The role of psychological basic needs

Antecedents and consequences of parental psychological control and autonomy support: The role of psychological basic needs

Psychometric Evaluation of the Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction and Frustration Scale (BPNSFS) in Italy

The relationship between multidimensional perfectionism and psychological need thwarting in junior sports participants

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About