1950
DOI: 10.1037/h0061791
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychological constriction on several projective tests.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1953
1953
1962
1962

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Attempts to validate the alleged relationship between Rorschach signs and such traits as constriction and impulsiveness have been no more successful (Carp, 1950;Holtzman, 1950). Very few such studies have been made.…”
Section: Rorschach Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attempts to validate the alleged relationship between Rorschach signs and such traits as constriction and impulsiveness have been no more successful (Carp, 1950;Holtzman, 1950). Very few such studies have been made.…”
Section: Rorschach Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent research, however, would seem to justify the caution of Bellak that "the projective hypothesis... has to be handled with considerable care" [1, p.5]. The literature is replete with findings which suggest that behavioral measures based on projective techniques may be inconsistent and unpredictable [3,5,7,11,16,22,25,26,27].…”
Section: Creedmoor State Hospital and Adelphi Collegementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hamlin, Albee, and Leland (41) found that only 6 of 26 signs distinguished between groups of 20 normal college students, maladjusted persons, and neuropsychiatric Veterans Administration patients. Carp (23) tested the entire third grade, 47 boys and 46 girls, in a public school with the Rorschach. She studied the relationship between scores on that test and performances on Draw-Your-Own Family, Draw-How-You-Feel tests, and scores on the McFarland Trait Rating Blank.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%