1999
DOI: 10.1117/12.373330
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proximity effects of alternating phase-shift masks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such dimensional parameters to be controlled include line width (often synonymously named as critical dimension, CD), CD uniformity (CDU), pitch, height, sidewall angle, line edge/width roughness (LER/LWR). Furthermore, as high-resolution electron beam lithography (EBL) is usually applied in photomask manufacturing, it often suffers from, e.g., proximity effect [3] and fogging effect. For quality-management purposes, usually a kind of photomask standard is applied in photomask fabs, which serves as a "reference" for traceability of CD measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such dimensional parameters to be controlled include line width (often synonymously named as critical dimension, CD), CD uniformity (CDU), pitch, height, sidewall angle, line edge/width roughness (LER/LWR). Furthermore, as high-resolution electron beam lithography (EBL) is usually applied in photomask manufacturing, it often suffers from, e.g., proximity effect [3] and fogging effect. For quality-management purposes, usually a kind of photomask standard is applied in photomask fabs, which serves as a "reference" for traceability of CD measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One effect which causes a changed phase is the so called effective phase. Three dimensional simulations and 2D investigations have shown that the effective phase of a structure is also influenced by the lateral size and not only by the vertical profile 4 . The other possibility is that the MPM-248 measurement error for structures smaller than 1,5µm leads to the observed effect.…”
Section: Shifter Width [µM] Measured Phase [°]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One consequence of this however is, that OPc needs not only to take into account the phase structures on the mask, but also needs to change the width of these phase structures in order to correct successfully for proximity effects. This complication has already been tackled [10]. 6 …”
mentioning
confidence: 96%