2011
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/ker389
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protective effect of A/H1N1 vaccination in immune-mediated disease--a prospectively controlled vaccination study

Abstract: The results show that vaccination response is a function of disease type, intensity and character of medication and age. A single injection of adjuvanted influenza vaccine is sufficient to protect a high percentage of patients. Therefore, differential vaccination recommendations might in the future reduce costs and increase vaccination acceptance.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
63
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
8
63
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Only 25% of patients on rituximab showed a HI ≥ 1:40 at 3 weeks, 6 weeks and 6 months after vaccination, but 45%, 35% and 20% of patients with abatacept and 98%, 95% and 75% in healthy controls [46]. In that study a significant influence of disease type, intensity, type of medication and age were described [46].…”
Section: Rituximabmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Only 25% of patients on rituximab showed a HI ≥ 1:40 at 3 weeks, 6 weeks and 6 months after vaccination, but 45%, 35% and 20% of patients with abatacept and 98%, 95% and 75% in healthy controls [46]. In that study a significant influence of disease type, intensity, type of medication and age were described [46].…”
Section: Rituximabmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…However, there was a significant lower GMT response to adjuvanted H1N1 influenza vaccination in 5 RA patients with rituximab and 10 RA patients with abatacept compared to 40 healthy controls [46]. Only 25% of patients on rituximab showed a HI ≥ 1:40 at 3 weeks, 6 weeks and 6 months after vaccination, but 45%, 35% and 20% of patients with abatacept and 98%, 95% and 75% in healthy controls [46].…”
Section: Rituximabmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A recent study, in 2012, involving RA patients receiving tocilizumab, methotrexate (MTX) or the combination of the two suggest that there was no decreased effects of TCZ, and post-vaccination GMTs increased significantly for all strains of the influenza vaccine [19]. Abatacept, on the other hand, has been shown to significantly reduce the humoral response to pandemic 2009 influenza A/H1N1 vaccine in RA patients compared to patients with RA on methotrexate and healthy controls, although this study did not evaluate tri-or quadrivalent vaccine [12,20]. Rituximab severely reduces the responsiveness of the influenza vaccine in patients with RA as shown in several studies, and, not surprisingly, this reduction in response is dependent upon the timing of the vaccine in relation to rituximab administration [21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Influenzamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Применение абатацепта (АБЦ) в виде внутривенных инфузий у больных РА вело к значимому снижению постиммунизационного ответа на вакцину против эпидемического (H1N1) гриппа по срав-нению с пациентами, получавшими МТ, и контролем [35,36]. С другой стороны, при назначении АБЦ в форме для подкожного введения частота серопротекции по отноше-нию к двум из трех антигенов сезонной противогриппоз-ной вакцины составила 82,1% [37], что полностью соответ-ствовало вышеуказанным требованиям Европейского ко-митета.…”
Section: гриппunclassified