Proposal Of Landfill Site Model In The Particular Territory

Abstract

Nowadays, waste logistics is a relevant element within the worldwide logistics system. This paper is focused on the proposal of the appropriate model of landfill site for disposal of municipal waste. This issue refers to waste logistics in urban areas. In this regard, three different alternative models of landfill sites are considered. Landfill site model can significantly influence the waste management productivity and effectiveness of the enterprise. In the paper, one of the decision-making problem methods is utilized. This particular method enables to assess each model of landfill site in relation to each of the specified criterion and order the models according to the achieved results.

Application of the Vogel Approximation Method to Reduce Transport-logistics Processes

“…If two identical values are found, it is purely a matter of choice which option will be chosen for the next calculation step. Subsequently, the procedure is repeated-from the recalculation of differences to crossing out unnecessary cells [12][13][14][15][16][17].…”

Značaj dinamičke detekcije težine željezničkih vozila

“…177/1995 Coll., which issues the building and technical regulations of the Czech railways, here, the tracks are national, regional and railway sidings classified into track load classes. Track load classes are defined by the maximum parameters of the model RV: axle load, weight per unit length and the configuration of the drive axles [9], [10].…”

Predictors of Customer Satisfaction with Mass Transit Transport Scheme: Evidence from an Emerging Economy

“…Previous studies have examined the performance of mass transit businesses from the perspective of service quality using dimensions such as availability, accessibility, information, time, comfort, safety, and ecological impact (Enimola, Egwu & Nafiu, 2021;Mudenda & Guga, 2017;Chocholac et al 2020). Some other factors explored include comfort, cleanliness (Le-Klähn, Hall & Gerike 2014); line routing (Stopka, Čejka, Kampf, Bartuška, 2015); information about routes (Budiono, 2009); circulation of vehicles (Kampf, Zeman, Beneš, 2015); the overall condition of the vehicles and stops, security (Budiono, 2009); optimising timetables, the availability of space and seats (Le-Klähn, Hall et al, 2014); network coverage, the competence and behaviour of staff, and time efficiency (Guiver, Lumsdon & Weston, 2008). However, these findings have been mostly mixed and inconclusive, and the personal characteristics of commuters, which affect how commuters evaluate service quality, are rarely documented.…”