2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prophylactic properties of biofloc- or Nile tilapia-conditioned water against Vibrio parahaemolyticus infection of whiteleg shrimp (Penaeus vannamei)

Abstract: Research highlights: 1. Whiteleg shrimp Penaeus vannamei were bath challenged with Vibrio parahaemolyticus and shrimp had significantly greater survival in biofloc than clear seawater during 96 h post-challenge. 2. Shrimp stocking density (1 to 5 shrimp per 400 mL) did not influence survival of shrimp bath challenged with V. parahaemolyticus in either biofloc or clear seawater conditions. 3. Survival of shrimp bath challenged with V. parahaemolyticus was significantly greater in Nile tilapia-conditioned water … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
11
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the present study are similar to those obtained by Azim and Little (2008), for MM (12%); however, the value for PB was higher (38%) than the ones found in this study (23%). These variations may occur because the composition of the bioflocs are related to several factors, such as the source of carbon added to the growth development of some microbial communities, diets, animals and different sampling periods (Lobato et al 2019;Sajali et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of the present study are similar to those obtained by Azim and Little (2008), for MM (12%); however, the value for PB was higher (38%) than the ones found in this study (23%). These variations may occur because the composition of the bioflocs are related to several factors, such as the source of carbon added to the growth development of some microbial communities, diets, animals and different sampling periods (Lobato et al 2019;Sajali et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, in situ utilization of microbial flocs in biofloc system by aquaculture organism as well as the utilization of processed biofloc as a feed ingredient has been reported to improve growth performance and the health of shrimp [ 161 , 162 , 163 , 164 , 165 , 166 ]. There are few reports that have illustrated the role of biofloc in stimulating the non-specific immunity and resistance of shrimp against microbial pathogens including AHPND V. parahaemolyticus [ 167 , 168 ]. Hostin et al (2019) designed an experiment to investigate the effect of autotrophic (with or without probiotics) and heterotrophic bioflocs (with or without probiotics) on L. vannamei against AHPND bacterial strain.…”
Section: Control and Management Of Acute Hepatopancreatic Necrosis Disease (Ahpnd)—current Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En general los Bioflocs son excelentes materias primas para la alimentación de animales, por ser ricos en proteínas y lípidos naturales, por lo que se catalogan como "Alimento natural in situ", y al mismo tiempo como "Control biológico de residuos" al controlar los desechos de los peces y mejorar la calidad del agua 10,42 ; por ello, varios autores han trabajado en el uso del Biofloc como suplemento alimenticio en especies acuáticas; la harina de Biofloc se ha trabajado como sustituto de la harina de pescado y de la harina de soya en alimento para especies acuáticas; encontrando buenos resultados productivos en camarones, mojarras y carpas 49 , evidenciando incluso buen crecimiento de la mojarra en (SB) cuando se disminuyó el porcentaje de proteína en su alimento comercial 49,62,70 . Otras investigaciones realizadas en carpas y camarones confirmaron estos hallazgos, concluyendo que el Biofloc podía ser utilizado como suplemento alimenticio, haciendo inclusión en dietas hasta en un 30%, con lo cual se evidenciaba un efecto positivo sobre la actividad enzimática digestiva de los animales y por ende mejores rendimientos de crecimiento 85,95 .…”
Section: Autor Proteína (%) Carbohid (%) Lípidos (%) Fibra (%) Cenizas (%) Energía (Kcal)unclassified