1974
DOI: 10.1002/pssa.2210260114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Properties of the gold acceptor state in silicon

Abstract: At high resistivity gold compensated n+−i−n+‐silicon samples the values of c p− and c p−/cn were determined. These values were obtained from a current controlled negative resistance (CCNR) occuring at the steady state I–U characteristic without using the unknown magnitude of the spin degeneracy factor g and the values of p1 and n1. The CCNR is caused by double injection filaments arising in space charge limited current (sclc) diodes. The origin of these filaments is given. The formation of these current filame… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1975
1975
1978
1978

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…I n this case one obtains according to the Ferrni-Dirac statistics for nT(x) the concentration of electrons in the deep level ( N , total trap concentration, n, = gN, exp (-( E , -E,)/kT), g spin degeneracy factor, N , effective density of states, E, -E , energy of the deep level). TO The assumption 6n(z) < 6n,(x) means that nearly all injected carriers are captured by the deep level, this is always realized in high resistivity, compensated samples, as was experimentally shown in [4]. With (4) leads to the following differential equation:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…I n this case one obtains according to the Ferrni-Dirac statistics for nT(x) the concentration of electrons in the deep level ( N , total trap concentration, n, = gN, exp (-( E , -E,)/kT), g spin degeneracy factor, N , effective density of states, E, -E , energy of the deep level). TO The assumption 6n(z) < 6n,(x) means that nearly all injected carriers are captured by the deep level, this is always realized in high resistivity, compensated samples, as was experimentally shown in [4]. With (4) leads to the following differential equation:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This is because the time dependence of the electric field has also to be taken into account in the time dependence of the current j ( t ) N n ( t ) Z'(t). The consideration of the time dependence of the electric field averaged over the whole sample led t o large deviations from the exponential time dependence of the current for t > rcn [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%