2016
DOI: 10.1002/pip.2811
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Progress in thin film CIGS photovoltaics – Research and development, manufacturing, and applications

Abstract: This review summarizes the current status of Cu(In,Ga)(S,Se) 2 (CIGS) thin film solar cell technology with a focus on recent advancements and emerging concepts intended for higher efficiency and novel applications. The recent developments and trends of research in laboratories and industrial achievements communicated within the last years are reviewed, and the major developments linked to alkali post deposition treatment and composition grading in CIGS, surface passivation, buffer, and transparent contact laye… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
186
0
7

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 276 publications
(200 citation statements)
references
References 153 publications
1
186
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Statistics in this sense is still missing. It may still be speculated, that a partial void surface passivation could explain the typically observed superiority [1] of wet buffer layer deposition methods as compared to dry ones in case of multi-stage co-evaporated CIGS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Statistics in this sense is still missing. It may still be speculated, that a partial void surface passivation could explain the typically observed superiority [1] of wet buffer layer deposition methods as compared to dry ones in case of multi-stage co-evaporated CIGS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent improvements in the development of Cu(In,Ga)Se 2 (CIGS) solar cells have mostly focused on the optimization of the charge-selective contacts and on the addition of alkali metals for interface modification and doping [1]. Further increases of the device efficiency might be prevented by the presence of structural defects in the CIGS layer, such as voids and compositional inhomogeneities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7] CIGS solar cells have recently shown conversion efficiencies exceeding 22 and 19.8% for small-area cells (0.5 or 1.0 cm 2 ) [8][9][10] and submodules (24 cm 2 ), 11) respectively. However, almost all CIGS solar cells are based on polycrystalline CIGS layers deposited on soda lime glass (SLG) substrates by a three-stage method 12) or by the selenization and sulfurization of metal precursors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, CuInSe 2 ’s formation temperature is relatively lower than that of CuInGaSe 2 31 . Since the bandgap increase is directly correlated with increases in Ga and S, the bottom layer should have a bandgap higher than the middle layer 2224,32 . On the other hand, the layer near surface also has a higher bandgap due to the high content of S, which was achieved by continuing sulfurization even after selenization 3336 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of compositional gradients are well documented in the solar cell field 2225 . The relative amount of Ga and S determines the CIGSSe’s bandgap energy, which can range from 1.04 eV for pure CuInSe 2 to 2.4 eV for pure CuGaS 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%