2011
DOI: 10.21009/jep.022.08
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Program Pelatihan Tutor Universitas Terbuka

Abstract: Tujuan  evaluasi Program Pelatihan Tutor-Universitas Terbuka (UT)  adalah  untuk menilai sejauhmana Program Pelatihan Tutor-UT  berhasil mempersiapkan peserta untuk menjadi tutor UT yang profesional  dalam  melaksanakan kegiatan Tutorial Tatap Muka (TTM). Evaluasi ini menerapkan model evaluasi CIPP (Stufflebeam) yang dikombinasikan dengan Kubus 3 Dimensi (Hammond). Kesimpulan dari studi ini adalah: 1) tujuan program pelatihan telah dirumuskan berdasarkan kebutuhan tutor, analisis instruksional, dan mengacu  ke… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…learning materials, services learning, network facilities, bandwidth, equipment, and funds to support the interactive process of learning (Jin et al, 2020;Mor & Winters, 2007;Suparto, 2012;Tan 2013). Education is organized with the management and service of learning programs that create student independence in learning, places, facilities, instructorial processes, and student satisfaction that affect learning outcomes, and the real time online system as the digital media to increases public trust and increases the effectiveness of implementing new student admissions (Ardhi, 2015;Suratno, 2018;Suryanto et al, 2013;Wardrip & Shapiro, 2016) Evaluation of the school's internal quality assurance system is carried out by discussing or sharing the results of observations from the Team and the observed teachers, both individually and in groups to be adjusted to the operational standards of the education system that have been set in schools (Aimah & Purwanto, 2019;Prastati, 2011;Sitthisak, 2008;Suratno, 2018). Open University needs to continue to carry out a sustainable and comprehensive evaluation through discussion studies and research in order to accommodate aspirations, input or recommendations and the participation of all parties, especially instructors, Study groups and students as positive and constructive as well as scientific contributions to improve service quality strategies and instructorial education of Open University.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…learning materials, services learning, network facilities, bandwidth, equipment, and funds to support the interactive process of learning (Jin et al, 2020;Mor & Winters, 2007;Suparto, 2012;Tan 2013). Education is organized with the management and service of learning programs that create student independence in learning, places, facilities, instructorial processes, and student satisfaction that affect learning outcomes, and the real time online system as the digital media to increases public trust and increases the effectiveness of implementing new student admissions (Ardhi, 2015;Suratno, 2018;Suryanto et al, 2013;Wardrip & Shapiro, 2016) Evaluation of the school's internal quality assurance system is carried out by discussing or sharing the results of observations from the Team and the observed teachers, both individually and in groups to be adjusted to the operational standards of the education system that have been set in schools (Aimah & Purwanto, 2019;Prastati, 2011;Sitthisak, 2008;Suratno, 2018). Open University needs to continue to carry out a sustainable and comprehensive evaluation through discussion studies and research in order to accommodate aspirations, input or recommendations and the participation of all parties, especially instructors, Study groups and students as positive and constructive as well as scientific contributions to improve service quality strategies and instructorial education of Open University.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Sax G. (in Widoyoko, 2017), context evaluation is a description and specification of the environment of the program to be implemented as well as unfulfilled demands. The purpose of analyzing the context is to analyze if the training program's objectives have been correctly designed, based on the results of the instructional analysis and taking into account the existence of policies (Prastati, 2011). Context evaluation seeks to assess the whole state of the item by identifying flaws and strengths, diagnosing problems and proposing solutions, and determining whether goals and priorities are appropriate for the needs to be achieved (Tulung, 2014).…”
Section: Context Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chaer & Agustinan (2014) menyatakan bahwa masyarakat tutur merupakan sekelompok orang yang tidak hanya menggunakan bahasa yang sama, tetapi juga kelompok orang yang mempunyai norma yang sama dalam menggunakan bentuk-bentuk bahasa, serta adanya perasaan menggunakan tuturan yang sama. Menurut Ibrahim & Suparno (2011), masyarakat tutur terbagi atas pengertian mikro dan makro. Dalam definisi mikro, masyarakat tutur merupakan sekelompok orang yang karena tempat atau daerahnya, profesinya, hobinya, dan sebagainya, menggunakan bahasa atau bentuk bahasa yang sama serta mempunyai penilaian dan norma-norma pemakaian bahasa yang sama.…”
unclassified