2010
DOI: 10.1590/s1413-73722010000100017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Produtividade, necessidade e afetividade: justiça distributiva e empatia em jovens brasileiros

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth noting that the proportion of the second-round-gambler men was higher than the proportion of the second-round-gambler women. This apparently contradicts the previous study that found women to be more prone to help than men did (Sampaio, Camino, & Roazzi, 2010), especially in a empathy induced scenario (Espinosa & Kovářík, 2015). However, as far as the fi rst round of gambling is concerned, the women had a high proportion on helping decisions.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is worth noting that the proportion of the second-round-gambler men was higher than the proportion of the second-round-gambler women. This apparently contradicts the previous study that found women to be more prone to help than men did (Sampaio, Camino, & Roazzi, 2010), especially in a empathy induced scenario (Espinosa & Kovářík, 2015). However, as far as the fi rst round of gambling is concerned, the women had a high proportion on helping decisions.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 86%
“…According to Bernhardt & Singer (2012), emotional contagion aff ects sharing behavior, and can trigger feelings such as compassion, sympathy and empathic concern, promoting further pro-social behavior. Previous studies show, in hypothetical scenarios, more empathic adolescents allocated resources for employees who accomplished a task together, based on the principle of need -to give more to those who need more - (Sampaio, Camino, & Roazzi, 2010). Also, scores on empathic concern and perspective taking were positively correlated to evaluations of charity as a fairer system of allocation, among individuals who concluded a task at Amazon Mechanical Turk (Niemi & Young, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Os artigos mais recentes encontrados sobre esse tema são os de Sampaio, Camino e Roazzi (2009;2010) e Sampaio et al (2008). Entretanto, encontraram-se também pesquisas cujo foco foi algum outro aspecto da justiça (LOOS; FERREIRA; VASCONCELOS, 1999;MENIN, 2000) Os dados indicam que a escolha de uma mesma sanção pode ter justificativas diferentes.…”
Section: Tipos De Sanção Escolhidos Por Adolescentes Que Cuidam E Eduunclassified