2015
DOI: 10.5935/1806-6690.20150006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Productive characteristics, nutrition and agronomic efficiency of polymer-coated MAP in lettuce crops

Abstract: -In contrast to enhanced-efficiency nitrogen fertilisers, principally urea, phosphate fertilisers have been little studied and the available information is limited. The aim of this work therefore was to evaluate the productive and nutritional characteristics and the agronomic efficiency of a polymer-coated MAP fertilizer on two subsequent lettuce crops. The experiment was carried out in a greenhouse, in pots with a capacity of 4 kg, filled with a dystrophic yellow Latosol of a clayey texture. The experimental … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
6
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results agree with those of Corrêa et al (2008) in maize crops and Chagas et al (2015) in two lettuce crops, who observed a reduction in phosphorus use efficiency with dosage increases. However, Chagas et al (2015) found increased phosphate efficiency with polymer-coated MAP fertilizer in both lettuce crops, improving residual phosphorus used, but not for onions (Chagas et al, 2016). However, increased nutrient availability and the source used are not the only factors that can alter the efficiency rate.…”
Section: Nutrient Utilization Efficiencysupporting
confidence: 82%
“…These results agree with those of Corrêa et al (2008) in maize crops and Chagas et al (2015) in two lettuce crops, who observed a reduction in phosphorus use efficiency with dosage increases. However, Chagas et al (2015) found increased phosphate efficiency with polymer-coated MAP fertilizer in both lettuce crops, improving residual phosphorus used, but not for onions (Chagas et al, 2016). However, increased nutrient availability and the source used are not the only factors that can alter the efficiency rate.…”
Section: Nutrient Utilization Efficiencysupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The coating of phosphate fertilizers with anionic polymers with affinity for cations such as aluminum and iron may attenuate the adverse effects of soil P precipitation and increase the efficiency of phosphate fertilization (Chagas et al, 2015;2016a;2016b). Adding both Mg and anionic polymers to the coating may result in increased P uptake and coffee plant growth compared with other phosphate fertilizer technologies, such as resincoated fertilizers, which decrease the rate of P released from the fertilizer granule to the soil (Huett;Gogel, 2000;Du;Zhou, 2006;Broschat;Moore, 2007;Sanders et al, 2012;Adams;Frantz;Bugbee, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there are many studies that demonstrate the CSRF water dissolution rate (Bortolin et al, 2012;Lubkowski, 2014;Lubkowski et al, 2015;Ahmad et al, 2015) and agronomic efficiency (Pauly et al, 2002;Figueiredo et al, 2012;Silva et al, 2012;Chagas et al, 2015), little is known about the characteristics of organic polymers that could reduce the negative effects of previous fertilizer P contact time with soil on P availability and the consequent growth response by the plant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%