Beer in Health and Disease Prevention 2009
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-373891-2.00006-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Production of Alcohol-Free Beer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
101
0
6

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
101
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in the most part of the would the maximum allowed alcohol concentration is 0.5% (v/v) (7)(8)(9). However, in the most part of the would the maximum allowed alcohol concentration is 0.5% (v/v) (7)(8)(9).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the most part of the would the maximum allowed alcohol concentration is 0.5% (v/v) (7)(8)(9). However, in the most part of the would the maximum allowed alcohol concentration is 0.5% (v/v) (7)(8)(9).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned above, S . ludwigii is used to produce low‐alcohol or alcohol‐free beer due to its inability to ferment maltose (Montanari et al ., ; Brányik et al ., ). Brettanomyces bruxellensis is well known for its role in Lambic beer fermentation because of volatile phenolic compound formation.…”
Section: Low‐alcohol and Alcohol‐free Beersmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Looking at the seven volatile compounds quantified in this study (Table 2), for the ethyl acetate, the evaporation was almost completed at the first 7.53% vapor fraction (Vf), correspondent with the average of % Vf at 15 min of the process (Table 1), in both samples and pressures (from initial values of 17.82 and 26.54 mg/L to 1.07 and 3.65 at 102 mbar; and to 4.09 and 5.18 mg/L at 200 mbar, for the samples S and G respectively), although for the 200 mbar pressure the evaporation seems more gradually. Table 3 Losses of total esters and alcohols in percentage (%) by different alcohol free beer production processes: lab-scale vacuum distillation (this work, present as the average of both samples losses), osmotic distillation (Liguori et al, 2015), vacuum rectification (Montanari et al, 2009), falling film evaporation, dialysis (Liguori et al, 2015) and reverse osmosis (Stein, 1993 Sucrose 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Ethanol 0.0000 0.0000 2.0000 −12.6000 −1.8000 9.5000 2.5000 2.5000 0.0000 −0.0503 0.0000 Ethyl acetate 0.0000 0.3000 0.0000 2.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 −1.8000 0.0000 1-Propanol 0.0000 12.6000 −0.8296 0.0000 0.9130 0.0000 3.0350 3.0350 0.0000 1.1919 0.0000 Isobutanol 0.0000 1.8000 0.0000 −0.7573 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Isopentyl acetate 0.0000 −9.5000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.0000 0.0000 2-Methylbutanol 0.0000 −0.3000 0.0000 −2.0368 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3-Methylbutanol 0.0000 −0.7256 0.0000 −2.0368 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2-Phenylethanol 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Water 0.0000 −2.5035 −1.8000 −7.0000 0.0000 −2.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Nitrogen 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1-Propanol was almost completely gone within the first of 10.52% Vf in both experiments and beers apart from the S sample at 200 mbar, in which its lost extended to a 14.43% Vf.…”
Section: Differences Of the Volatile Compound Profile During The Labomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strategies can be divided into two main groups: biological and physical methods (Brányik et al, 2012;Montanari, Marconi, Mayer, & Fantozzi, 2009;Olmo et al, 2014). While physical methods withdraw the ethanol from a fermented beer, biological methods aim at controlling the alcohol production during the fermentation process (Zürcher, Jakob, & Back, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%