Produção De Mudas De Citros Com Diferentes Combinações Copa E Porta-Enxerto Em Viveiro Protegido

Rodrigues, M. J.; Oliveira, E. R. M. de; Girardi, Eduardo Augusto; Lêdo, Carlos Alberto da Silva; Filho, Walter dos Santos Soares

doi:10.1590/0100-2945-284/14

Cited by 14 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…TABELA 1 -Análise química do solo da área experimental, Capixaba, Acre, 2016 As mudas foram obtidas em viveiro telado com 50% de sombreamento pelo método de enxertia por borbulhia em "T" invertido, cuja inserção da borbulha da copa foi feita a 30 cm do colo do porta-enxerto com posterior amarrio através de fita de polietileno para a fixação das partes (GUILHERME et al, 2014;PORTELA et al, 2016;RODRIGUES et al, 2016).…”

Section: Methodsunclassified

Desempenho Agronômico De Lima Ácida Tahiti Em Combinação Com Diferentes Porta-Enxertos Em Capixaba, Acre

Rodrigues¹,

Neto²,

Lessa³

et al. 2018

Enci Bio

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Methodsunclassified

Desempenho Agronômico De Lima Ácida Tahiti Em Combinação Com Diferentes Porta-Enxertos Em Capixaba, Acre

Rodrigues¹,

Neto²,

Lessa³

et al. 2018

Enci Bio

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…'tahiti' acid lime (Citrus latifolia tanaka), popularly known in Brazil as tahiti lemon, has emerged as an alternative to sweet orange producers due to its good adaptation to tropical climatic conditions and greater economic value (RODRIGueS et al, 2016).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of Rootstocks for ‘Tahiti’ Acid Lime in Northern State of Minas Gerais

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study was to evaluate 12 rootstock varieties on the development and quality of ‘Tahiti’ acid lime fruits cultivated in the municipality of Jaíba, MG. Seedlings were planted in an experimental orchard in November 2008, using 8 x 5 meters spacing and drip irrigation. The experiment was conducted using a scion cultivar (Tahiti acid lime, IAC-5 cultivar) and the following 12 rootstocks: ‘Rangpur’ lime, ‘Troyer’ citrange, ‘Carrizo’ citrange, 1707 hybrid (Rangpur lime x Swingle trifoliate), 1710 and 1697 citrandarins, 1708citradia, ‘Swingle’ citrumelo, ‘Cleopatra’ and ‘Sunki’ mandarins, ‘Volkamer’ lemon, and ‘Limeira’ trifoliate. A randomized block design with five replicates and three trees per plot was used. Trunk diameter of both rootstock and scion, as well as height, diameter, and canopy volume, yield, fruit mass, number of fruits per tree, productivity, production efficiency index, longitudinal diameter, equatorial diameter, total soluble solids, total acidity, and vitamin C content of fruits were evaluated. ‘Volkameriano’ and ‘Cleopatra’ rootstocks promoted higher plant vigor and productivity for ‘Tahiti’ acid lime. However, ‘Limeira’ trifoliate and ‘Troyer’ citrange produced less vigor, but increased production efficiency; and can be used as alternative rootstocks for ‘Rangpur’ lime, as long as adjustments are performed in the planting spacing to increase productivity. In general, no differences in physical and chemical characteristics of fruits for all treatments were found, and fruits remained within commercial standards.

show abstract

“…Moreover, the genetic potential in conventionally produced seedlings of 'Pera CNPMF-D6' orange grafted on 'Santa Cruz' Rangpur lime (C. limonia Osbeck), in protected nursery, as found by Rodrigues et al (2016) with superior leaf area, root system volume and taproot diameter, was greater than that of other combinations of this scion with the rootstocks HTR-51, LVK × LCR-038, TSKC × CTR-002, 'Flying Dragon' trifoliate and 'Swingle' citrumelo.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 97%

Subsoiling and Planting Method on the Initial Growth of ‘Pera’ Sweet Orange (Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck)

Meneses¹,

Filho²,

Filho³

et al. 2019

JAS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The objective of this work was to evaluate the vegetative vigor and root architecture of ‘Pera CNPMF D-6’ sweet orange grafted on Rangpur lime at early stage of development, submitted to different planting methods (planting of nursery trees produced in a protected environment-PNT and planting of seeds at the definitive place-PS) and soil preparation with and without subsoiling. The experiment was carried out at the Lagoa do Coco Farm, Rio Real, Bahia, Brazil. Biometric evaluations were performed to estimate the variables: canopy volume (CV), vegetative vigor index (VVI) and canopy cover rates in the planting row (CCR-R) and interrow (CCR-I). Root samples were also collected up to a depth of 1.45 m at five points in the planting row. The roots were digitized and processed to obtain total root length (TRL), root length density (RLD), average root diameter (RD) and root length for the diameter classes. Plants produced in protected environment exhibit greater shoot vegetative and root development compared to those produced by sowing at the definitive place, at least for the young orchard and under rainfed conditions. Subsoiling did not affect root system distribution and PNT favored the increase in TRL along the soil profile compared to PS, for all diameter classes evaluated, contributing to the increase in vegetative vigor observed in the plants. Regardless of the management practices adopted, roots were concentrated in the first 0.35 m of the vertical soil profile, due to physical impediment caused by the presence of cohesive horizons.

show abstract

Produção De Mudas De Citros Com Diferentes Combinações Copa E Porta-Enxerto Em Viveiro Protegido

Cited by 14 publications

References 10 publications

Desempenho Agronômico De Lima Ácida Tahiti Em Combinação Com Diferentes Porta-Enxertos Em Capixaba, Acre

Desempenho Agronômico De Lima Ácida Tahiti Em Combinação Com Diferentes Porta-Enxertos Em Capixaba, Acre

Evaluation of Rootstocks for ‘Tahiti’ Acid Lime in Northern State of Minas Gerais

Subsoiling and Planting Method on the Initial Growth of ‘Pera’ Sweet Orange (Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About