Problematizando as noções de vulnerabilidade e risco social no cotidiano do SUAS

Abstract

RESUMO.Este ensaio, elaborado a partir das reflexões da autora, tem como objetivo discutir as noções de vulnerabilidade e risco social que integram os documentos do Sistema Único de Assistência Social (SUAS), enfocando os efeitos que emergem do uso dessas noções no cotidiano dos profissionais em suas intervenções com as famílias. Nesse contexto, problematizam-se os riscos presentes nessas conexões que podem tornar os profissionais vulneráveis e cujo desconhecimento pode diminuir a capacidade das equipes e também o protagonismo e a autonomia das famílias. São eles o risco da psicologização, o risco da desqualificação, o risco da sobrecarga das mulheres e o risco da ressonância da vulnerabilidade. Concluí-se que o maior risco é o risco de maltrato à vida que se sustenta em atuações que podem encobrir práticas morais e resultar em relações de tutela e de assujeitamentos, impedindo relações de cuidado que se efetuam na intercessão, no encontro entre modelos e forças, permitindo a consolidação do SUAS de forma potente. Palavras-chave: Políticas públicas; vulnerabilidade; intervenção social. PROBLEMATIZING THE CONCEPTS OF VULNERABILITY AND SOCIAL RISK IN THE WORK ROUTINE OF THE SUAS (BRAZILIAN UNIFIED SOCIAL ASSISTANCE SYSTEM)ABSTRACT. This essay, composed from the author's reflections, aims to discuss the notions of vulnerability and social risk that integrate documents of the SUAS [Sistema Unificado de Assistência Social (Brazilian Unified Social Assistance System)], focusing on the effects that emerge from the use of such notions in the professionals' work routine, in their interventions with famili es. In this context, it discusses the risks present in these connections, which may make professionals vulnerable, and how the unawareness of them may impair the ability of the teams as well as the protagonism and autonomy of families. The risks are named as follows: risk of psychologization, risk of disqualification, risk of overloaded women and risk of resonance of vulnerabilities. We conclude that the biggest risk is the risk of life abuse, which is supported by actions that may cover moral practices and result in relations of tutelage and subjection, preventing relations of care that are established in the intersection, in the encounter between models and forces that allow the consolidation of the SUAS in a powerful way.

The Performance of Psychology Professionals in CRAS in the Countryside of Paraíba

“…As Romagnoli (2015) points out, this refers to unfavorable situations and the objective dimensions of social exclusion. He adds that these are situations by way of which individuals potentially have an altered or diminished response to life's natural risk or situations of embarrassment.…”

“…It is also worth pointing out that, as Ribeiro and Guzzo (2014), Romagnoli (2015) and Sicari, Oliveira, and Pereira (2015) draw attention to, although the current model is democratic and productive on paper, it is the professionals who work on a day-to-day basis that make public policies viable, or not. These authors provide evidence of the contradictions that exist between what is proposed in the legislation and what is actually experienced by professionals.…”

“…This has led to a signifi cant change in our understanding of the responsibilities and attributes of the psychology professionals who work with public social welfare policies (Alberto et al, 2014;, Florentino, 2014Hillesheim & Cruz, 2012;Macêdo, 2014;Macêdo, Alberto, & Pessoa, 2015;Moreira & Paiva, 2015;Motta & Scarparo, 2013;Ribeiro & Guzzo, 2014;Romagnoli, 2015Romagnoli, , 2016Senra & Guzzo, 2012;Siqueira & Lino, 2013, and others). From these studies it can be perceived that, within the context of public social welfare policies and so as to contribute to the development of the protagonism and autonomy of the users, psychology professionals should distance themselves from welfarist or repressive practices that blame individuals and their families for the situation in which they fi nd themselves.…”

“…As Alberto et al (2014) stress, the SUAS materializes and gives form to the LOAS as it puts into operation rights that are guaranteed by the Constitution as being the mechanisms of social protection. As Romagnoli (2015) points out, the basis of the PNAS is strengthening the capacity of individuals and families to face up to their vulnerability, with a view to protecting them from social risk situations. This legal framework presents a proposal that is different from the historical tradition of social welfare policies in Brazil, which are marked by charity, philanthropy and goodwill towards those who are deserving and in need, thus mobilizing help for the poor and poverty-stricken (Alberto et al, 2014;Cruz & Guareshi, 2010).…”

Atuação dos profissionais de psicologia nos CRAS do interior da Paraíba

“…Como destacam Alberto et al (2014) o SUAS materializa, dá forma e concretiza a LOAS na operacionalização dos direitos garantidos na Constituição e assegurados como mecanismos de proteção social. Como chama atenção Romagnoli (2015), na base da PNAS encontra-se o fortalecimento das capacidades dos indivíduos e das famílias para o enfrentamento da vulnerabilidade com vistas a protegê-los de situações de risco social. Percebe-se, por meio desse marco legal, uma proposta diferenciada da tradição histórica que vinha acompanhando as políticas de assistência social no Brasil, marcadas pela caridade em direção aos necessitados, pela fi lantropia e benemerência, mobilizando ajuda em direção aos pobres e miseráveis (Alberto et al, 2014;Cruz & Guareshi, 2010).…”