2009
DOI: 10.1177/1098300708330880
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevent-Teach-Reinforce

Abstract: Although there is a substantial empirical foundation for the basic intervention components of behavior analysis and positive behavior support (PBS), the field still lacks a standardized program model of individualized PBS suitable for widespread application by school personnel. This article provides a description of a standardized PBS model that is in the process of development and large-scale evaluation. The “Prevent-Teach-Reinforce” (PTR) model is designed to meet the behavior support needs of students with … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Results indicated significantly higher academic engagement, social skills, and decreased problem behavior. Dunlap, Iovannone, Wilson, Kincaid, and Strain (2010) used the Prevent-Teach-Reinforce model in an elementary school and reported two case studies that utilized a coaching component for two teachers of students with individualized behavior support plans as one component of the overall package intervention.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results indicated significantly higher academic engagement, social skills, and decreased problem behavior. Dunlap, Iovannone, Wilson, Kincaid, and Strain (2010) used the Prevent-Teach-Reinforce model in an elementary school and reported two case studies that utilized a coaching component for two teachers of students with individualized behavior support plans as one component of the overall package intervention.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on this we can say that educators and psychologists are mostly concerned about "problem behavior" in schools. When we reviewed the other sources in this study and outside the scope of this research we saw that effective evidence-based interventions and practices have been documented for addressing problem behaviors (Bohanon et al, 2006;Dunlap, Iovannone, Wilson, Kincaid, & Strain, 2010;Fox & Little, 2001;Franzen & Kamps, 2008;Kartub, Taylor-Greene, March, & Horner, 2000;Luiselli, Putnam, & Sunderland, 2002;McCurdy, Mannella, & Eldridge, 2003;McIntosh, Campbell, Carter, & Dickey, 2009;Scott, 2001;Simonsen, Britton, & Young, 2010;Todd, Campbell, Meyer, & Horner, 2008). Nevertheless, maintained and extended uses of these interventions and implementations have not been regular or extensive in other countries except the USA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Target guru berorientasi pada kemampuan afektif siswa seperti mengikuti kegiatan pembelajaran dengan tenang, tidak menjatuhkan sepeda motor ketika marah, tidak melempar gelas, tidak menyuruh semua orang diam ketika kegiatan pembelajaran di kelas berlangsung, dan mau mencatat materi. Kajian terdahulu tentang keterampilan vokasonal siswa autis juga menyebutkan bahwa permasalahan perilaku menjadi salah satu kendala dalam pembelajaran keterampilan vokasional (Dunlap, Iovannone, Wilson, Kincaid, & Strain, 2010;Hendricks, 2010;Schall, 2010).…”
Section: Inklusiunclassified