2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2015.04.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pressure swing adsorption for CO 2 /N 2 and CO 2 /CH 4 separation: Comparison between activated carbons and zeolites performances

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, capturing CO 2 using various porous materials has attracted increasing attention, including materials such as zeolites, mesoporous silica, metal-organic frameworks, molecular sieves and porous carbon, because of their abundant pore structures and high surface area. [1][2][3][4] Among these materials, porous carbons have the greatest potential for application because they are derived from a large variety of low-cost resources and have a highly developed porous structure, abundant functional groups, hydrophobicity and high availability. [5][6][7] Porous carbons are oen derived from various biomasses by thermal pyrolysis, chemical activation or hydrothermal carbonization (HTC), followed by carbonization or chemical activation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, capturing CO 2 using various porous materials has attracted increasing attention, including materials such as zeolites, mesoporous silica, metal-organic frameworks, molecular sieves and porous carbon, because of their abundant pore structures and high surface area. [1][2][3][4] Among these materials, porous carbons have the greatest potential for application because they are derived from a large variety of low-cost resources and have a highly developed porous structure, abundant functional groups, hydrophobicity and high availability. [5][6][7] Porous carbons are oen derived from various biomasses by thermal pyrolysis, chemical activation or hydrothermal carbonization (HTC), followed by carbonization or chemical activation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second highest was the biogas that had been through CO 2 adsorption using the combination of natural zeolite and biogas sludge based biochar (Z-BS) of 5,12%. Reference [18] reported that specific surface area of adsorbent had important role in CO 2 adsorption under a gas pressure range of 5-8 bar. The energy of biogas can be converted to energy for cooking through combustion process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This material was selected based on its effectiveness and stability [32,33]. Additionally, zeolite was chosen as the support material due to its properties as a molecular sieve for CO 2 adsorption [34,35]. The gasifier is equipped with a control system that allows the CO/CO 2 ratio to be maintained during operation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%