2018
DOI: 10.18178/ijesd.2018.9.11.1123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Calorific Value of Biogas after Carbon Dioxide Adsorption Process Using Natural Zeolite and Biochar

Abstract: We evaluated the adsorption of CO 2 in biogas mixtures using the combination of adsorbents: natural zeolite-natural zeolite (Z-Z), natural zeolite-chicken manure based biochar (Z-CM) and natural zeolite-biogas sludge based biochar (Z-BS). The amount of CO 2 adsorption was controlled at room temperature and under a gas pressure range of 5-7 bar. Samples of biogas before and after adsorption were analyzed by gas chromatography (GC) to determine the percentage of CH 4. The relationship between the percentage of C… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The removal of both CO2 and H2S from biogas through adsorption is a straightforward and effective approach. It has reported successful simultaneous and competitive removal of impurities using adsorption to enhance biogas quality and increase CH4 content [8]- [10]. Any remaining CO2 gas is absorbed by absorbers (C-101) using clean water (at a rate of 100 kg per batch).…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The removal of both CO2 and H2S from biogas through adsorption is a straightforward and effective approach. It has reported successful simultaneous and competitive removal of impurities using adsorption to enhance biogas quality and increase CH4 content [8]- [10]. Any remaining CO2 gas is absorbed by absorbers (C-101) using clean water (at a rate of 100 kg per batch).…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quality of biogas has a direct influence on the calorific value of the substrate [28] Indeed, the proportion of methane is closely related to the calorific value and this is demonstrated by the calorific value formula: PCI (calorific value) = 9.42*CH4% at 15°C at atmospheric pressure. The correlation between volatile total solid (TS) and biogas richness is negative.…”
Section: Composition Of the Produced Biogasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biogas, compared to natural gas, shows different flammability limits, meaning the range of fuel concentrations in which the gas mixture can be ignited in air and support flame propagation: due to the significant CO 2 presence in biogas (sometimes up to 50%), lower and upper flammability levels rise from 5.2% and 11.4% methane content in air (typical of natural gas) up to 10.4% and 22.8% biogas content in air (considering dry gas at 20 • C) [104]. Obviously, a higher CO 2 content in biogas negatively affects the calorific value of the biogas itself with negative impacts on the amount of recoverable energy [105]. As presented in Table 1, Imhoff and septic tanks normally show higher and variable CO 2 content than high-rate anaerobic processes, and the overall amount of biogas that is produced is limited by the fact that the process occurs at ambient temperature and by the limited size of the population served, which makes the anaerobic digestion much less profitable compared to larger-scale installations [106].…”
Section: Energy Recovery From Septic and Imhoff Tanksmentioning
confidence: 99%