2017
DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/223/1/012050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation of immobilized glucose oxidase wafer enzyme on calcium-bentonite modified by surfactant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results showed that the immobilization of the catalase was slightly better than the immobilization of GOD. In the literature, numerous methods for glucose oxidase immobilization can be found with great differences in their success 3,[8][9][10]12 . Efficiency of immobilization usually depends on the pH, temperature, concentration of enzyme in the solution before immobilization, and the time of immobilization.…”
Section: Enzyme Immobilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results showed that the immobilization of the catalase was slightly better than the immobilization of GOD. In the literature, numerous methods for glucose oxidase immobilization can be found with great differences in their success 3,[8][9][10]12 . Efficiency of immobilization usually depends on the pH, temperature, concentration of enzyme in the solution before immobilization, and the time of immobilization.…”
Section: Enzyme Immobilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immobilization of GOD provides several benefits that include enhanced stability, easier separation of the product from the reaction medium, increased productivity, and possibility of enzyme reuse. Different methods as well different carriers were tested for GOD immobilization [8][9][10][11][12][13] . Enzyme deactivation caused by aeration can be efficiently avoided by using porous support for immobilization 7,14,15 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the rapid vaporization, a thin layer of MIP (or NIP) was formed on the sensor's surface. (8) To evaporate the remaining solvent, the sensor was heated at 60 • C for 24 h. ( 9) The final step was to remove the template (glucose) from the MIP by washing the coated senor with DI water for 5 h. In order to deposit MIP and NIP accurately in the desired position (tip of the stub resonator) in sensors, a thin film of Kapton was utilized as a mask, shown in Figure 7a. The microscope image of the uncoated and the MIP-coated biosensor is illustrated in Figure 7b.…”
Section: Preparation Of Proposed Sensormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, GOD can be damaged by some chemical substances and detergents or changes in its optimal environment. Indeed, those GOD-based glucose sensors are always vulnerable to deactivation due to chemical deformation and possible thermal changes during fabrication, storage, or even while using [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, GOD can be damaged by some chemical substances and detergents or changes in its optimal environment for instance, temperatures above 40 °C, pH below 2, or above 8. Indeed, those GOD-based glucose sensors are always vulnerable to deactivation due to chemical deformation and possible thermal changes during fabrication, storage, or even while using (Widi et al, 2017). Because an operational potential was necessary for the amperometric measurement in enzymatic-based sensors, they do not work well with passive sensors.…”
Section: Sensitive Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%