Population life-cycle and stand structure in dense and open stands of the introduced tall herb Heracleum mantegazzianum

Abstract

Populations of the introduced Heracleum mantegazzianum consist of dense central stands, which gradually give way to open stands towards the margins. To analyse whether open stands are due to unsuitable conditions or represent the invading front for further spread, we studied life-cycle, population dynamics, stand structure and soil conditions of open and dense stands over two transition periods. Populations decreased during the first interval but increased after the extremely dry and warm summer of 2003 during the second interval. Open stands had shorter generation times, lower height, smaller proportions of small individuals and were less in equilibrium with the environment than dense stands. In open stands, growth to higher stages was most important, while in dense stands delayed development (self-loops) had a strong effect on population growth; stasis and fecundity contributed most to the difference in k between stand types. By petiole extension H. mantegazzianum may raise its leaves just above the resident vegetation. Therefore, younger stages develop faster in open stands, whereas strong competition by conspecific adults leads to longer generation times and a higher proportion of small individuals in dense stands. Disturbance due to extreme climatic conditions in summer 2003 equalised population dynamics of both stand types. Lifecycle variation between stand types makes it difficult to infer simple management rules. However, our data suggest that small and/or open stands of H. mantegazzianum may eventually serve as initials for further spread after land-use changes, whereas dense stands are stable and may represent sources of propagules.

Control of the toxic plantColchicum autumnalein semi‐natural grasslands: effects of cutting treatments on demography and diversity

“…Vital rates of perennial herbs respond differently to temporal and spatial variation (Jongejans & de Kroon ) with strong effects of temporal variation on growth. Extreme weather conditions, such as an unusual hot or dry summer, affect population growth rates through immediate effects on vital rates (Lennartsson & Oostermeijer ; Hüls, Otte & Eckstein ).…”

Impact assessment revisited: improving the theoretical basis for management of invasive alien species

“…The bold line represents the assumption implied in the basic linear impact formula (Parker et al 1999) of constant per-capita effect and, consequently, linear increase of the per-area effect with invader abundance. In contrast, the other curves show linear increase (broken line) and sigmoid increase (dotted line) of the percapita effect with invader abundance, which translates into a non-linear increase of per-area effect with invader abundance of the invader (Byers 2002;Thiele and Otte 2006;Hüls et al 2007;Traveset et al 2008). As a consequence, the effects an invader exerts on resident species, communities and ecosystems may change with habitat type (Griffen and Byers 2006;Hacker Fig.…”

Management recommendations for short‐lived weeds depend on model structure and explicit characterization of density dependence

“…Intraspecific competition suppresses population growth rate by reducing underlying vital rates (Parker 2000) and, therefore, population dynamics often differ between older established populations and invasion fronts within the same invasive plant species (Parker 2000; DeWalt 2006; Hüls, Otte, & Eckstein 2007). As the effect of a chosen management strategy on an invasive population partly depends on the magnitude of population growth rate (Ramula et al.…”

“…2008). Empirical studies on weed management in relation to population density are sometimes based on few density levels with a small number of spatial replicates (DeWalt 2006; Hüls, Otte, & Eckstein 2007 but see Parker 2000; Meekins & McCarthy 2002; Pardini et al. 2009).…”