The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2006
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-69092006000200004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Política externa brasileira: capital social e discurso democrático na América do Sul

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
11

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…In this sense, South American integration is a necessity rather than just an opportunity (AbdulHak 2013: 202). In fact, since the late 1970s, Brazilian diplomatic initiatives for fostering regional co-operation have become turning points in South American relations, disassembling the old geopolitics of containment in the process (Villa 2006). As noted by Abdul-Hak, there are numerous factors that promote Brazil's intense regional engagement, including:…”
Section: Brazil's International Agendamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, South American integration is a necessity rather than just an opportunity (AbdulHak 2013: 202). In fact, since the late 1970s, Brazilian diplomatic initiatives for fostering regional co-operation have become turning points in South American relations, disassembling the old geopolitics of containment in the process (Villa 2006). As noted by Abdul-Hak, there are numerous factors that promote Brazil's intense regional engagement, including:…”
Section: Brazil's International Agendamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Policy proposals that underestimated the weight of nationalism (such as 'peripheral realism' in Argentina or 'interdependence' in Mexico) were often short-lived, and have soon been transformed into anathemas in electoral campaigns. An important gap in the literature on the relationship between political regime and foreign policy in the region has been spotted by Rafael Villa (2006), who believes that South American countries which have undergone institutional democratization over the last decades may still lack 'democratic capital' in their societies, which consequently affects the way foreign policy is made. As stated by Villa,"The low degree of continuity and institutionalization of the so-called 'rules of the game' in various countries in the region, especially in the Andean Community, precludes a minimum of congruence between formal rationality (legally expressed in constitutions, clauses or decrees) and effective democratic practices" (Villa 2006, 82).…”
Section: Latin American Foreign Policy Analysis: Somewhere Between Olmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No estudo histórico da política externa brasileira, o marco conceitual com maior alcance explicativo formulado nos últimos anos é o que diferencia a ação diplomática do país no período da Guerra Fria e no pós-Guerra Fria. Há várias tipologias, representadas aqui pela dicotomia entre distância e engajamento (LAFER, 2000;LAM-PREIA, 1998, LIMA, 2003PINHEIRO, 2004;RIBEIRO, 2006;VI-GEVANI et al, 2003;VIGEVANI;OLIVEIRA, 2007;VILLA, 2006).…”
Section: Conclusãounclassified
“…Seu sucessor na pasta, Celso Lafer, utilizaria novamente a antinomia entre distância e participação para compreender a evolução da política externa brasileira (LAFER, 2000, p. 263). Na academia, o discurso diplomático de distância e participação ganhou consistência explicativa, particularmente nos trabalhos de Alfredo Valladão (2005), Letícia Pinheiro (2004), Maria Regina Soares de Lima (2003), Rafael Villa (2006), Tullo Vigevani e Marcelo F. de Oliveira (2007) e Tullo Vigevani, Marcelo F. de Oliveira e Rodrigo Cintra (2003). Com a exceção de Valladão, esses trabalhos são convergentes com a tese de Fonseca Jr., compreendendo as mudanças da política externa brasileira no período posterior à Guerra Fria dentro da dicotomia entre distância e engajamento.…”
unclassified