Policy lessons from health taxes: a systematic review of empirical studies

Abstract

BackgroundTaxes on alcohol and tobacco have long been an important means of raising revenues for public spending in many countries but there is increasing interest in using taxes on these, and other unhealthy products, to achieve public health goals. We present a systematic review of the research on health taxes, and aim to generate insights into how such taxes can: (i) reduce consumption of targeted products and related harms; (ii) generate revenues for health objectives and distribute the tax burden across income groups in an efficient and equitable manner; and (iii) be made politically sustainable.MethodsSix scientific and four grey-literature databases were searched for empirical studies of ‘health taxes’ – defined as those intended to increase the costs of manufacturing, distributing, retailing and/or consuming health-damaging products. Since reviews already exist of the evidence relating to traditional alcohol and tobacco excise taxes, we focus on other taxes such as taxes on retailers and manufacturers of unhealthy products, and consumer taxes targeting unhealthy foods, such as sugar-sweetened beverages.ResultsNinety-one peer-reviewed and 11 grey-literature studies met our inclusion criteria. The review highlights a recent, rapid rise in research in this area, most of which focuses on high-income countries and on taxes on food products or nutrients. Findings demonstrate that high tax rates on sugar-sweetened beverages are likely to have a positive impact on health behaviours and outcomes, and, while taxes on products reduce demand, they add to fiscal revenues. Common concerns about health taxes are also discussed.ConclusionsIf the primary policy goal of a health tax is to reduce consumption of unhealthy products, then evidence supports the implementation of taxes that increase the price of products by 20% or more. However, where taxes are effective in changing health behaviours, the predictability of the revenue stream is reduced. Hence, policy actors need to be clear about the primary goal of any health tax and frame the tax accordingly – not doing so leaves taxes vulnerable to hostile lobbying. Conversely, earmarking health taxes for health spending tends to increase public support so long as policymakers follow through on specified spending commitments.Systematic review registration number CRD42016048603 Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-017-4497-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Promoting Cardiovascular Health in Early Childhood and Transitions in Childhood through Adolescence: A Workshop Report

“…Instead, entirely new approaches may achieve similar results. For example, research is needed to determine whether population or policy interventions such as the levying of taxes, [93][94][95][96] the creation of standards for school cafeteria food and kids' meals in restaurants, 97,98 and the implementation of media campaigns might achieve similar results. 99 Environmental approaches need to be independently tested and evaluated.…”

Oral Submucous Fibrosis;

“…Globally increased taxes on alcohol and tobacco reduced consumption of targeted products while generating revenues for achieving sustainable health objectives, distributing the burden of tax across all socio-economic groups in an equitable and efficient manner; thereby making it more politically sustainable. 27 Clinical criteria for the diagnosis of OSF has been established by consensus of histopathologists and oral maxillofacial surgeons in a workshop in Malaysia. 28 This clinical criterion includes presence of leathery mucosal texture, fibrous bands that are palpable manually, loss of appearance of tongue papillae, burning sensation to spicy food in all clinical cases, rigidity of the tongue and blanching of mucosa.…”

Revenue allocation from SSB taxes: making the case for oral health promotion

“…Sugar‐sweetened beverage taxes generate revenue that can be reinvested to further improve health, as occurs with revenues from tobacco taxation. At the implementation of SSB taxes, some governments posited that revenues from SSB taxes would be earmarked for public health activities. For example, the UK government stated that revenues from the Soft Drink Industry Levy would fund physical education activities in primary schools and provide a funding boost for breakfast clubs.…”