Policing the Affective Society: Beyond Governmentality in the Theory of Social Control

Abstract

This article argues that certain consistent themes are evident in police studies research (including my own) with respect to the issue of emotion. I have described these 'emotional repertoires' as paranoid in character. By this I mean that it is a milieu which overvalues order, homogeneity and stasis while being suspicious of difference, fluidity and change. It tends to split the world into good and bad parts with very rigid boundaries, and it projects negative qualities onto those groups and individuals imagined to be 'bad'. It is also a milieu which strongly displays a collective desire to order, control or, sometimes, attack outgroups onto which bad qualities have been projected. The article develops an initial theoretical framework for understanding this apparent linkage between a particular occupational milieu and a specific range of emotional orientations to the world. I argue that we might think in terms of the institutional production of affective subject positions -and use ideas taken from

The neurotic citizen

“…It is this rational subject that seems to govern itself without affects or emotions and it is able to responsibilize itself by calculation. There are many practices around us that calls this subject into question (see Watson, 1999). I will shift my focus to these practices, which I shall call 'governing through neurosis' but I will first briefly discuss Foucault's concept of biopolitics as it pertains to this concept.…”

Hope for nanotechnology: anticipatory knowledge and the governance of affect

“…Second, we should remember that other practices of governing that are not explicitly anticipatory also take place through affect. Watson (1999), for example, traces how UK policing is bound up with the affect of suspicion whilst Orr (2006) tracks the role of morale in cold war civil defence planning.…”

From Individual to Social Defences in Psychosocial Criminology

“…Lawyers, according to Marsh, are taught to take words and actions at face value; the legal is thus the antithesis of the psychodynamic approach. Similar studies of regulatory agencies, courts, police (see Watson, 1999 for a more Lacanian analysis of policing) are likely to prove valuable.…”