This article is intended to work on a number of different levels. First it is concerned with the brain-become-subject as hypothesized by Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari in their book What is Philosophy?. It is concerned with demonstrating the convergence between Deleuze and Guattari's work and the claims of some contemporary neuro-biological theories of consciousness. In particular, I will be comparing Deleuze and Guattari's hypothesis to the work of Gerald Edelman and Daniel Dennett. Second, it is my contention that the shared themes of this convergence amount to the renewal of a paradigm in the understanding of human consciousness and its relationship to the body, which I have elsewhere called `the new Bergsonism'. The emphasis in the text on themes such as duration, material connectedness and immanence, Becoming, multiplicity, selection and so on, is taken to be self-evidently Bergsonian. The primary task of this particular article is, then, to establish a careful technical demonstration of the existence of a shared set of themes and concepts. I have made this demonstration more concrete by placing it within the context of a discussion of the affective dimensions of the experience of social idiosyncrasy (as defined by Adorno and Horkheimer). My wider agenda is that this demonstration of shared themes in poststructuralism and neuro-science should contribute towards a more general attempt to establish a neo-Bergsonian paradigm at the heart of a new sociology of affect.
This article argues that certain consistent themes are evident in police studies research (including my own) with respect to the issue of emotion. I have described these 'emotional repertoires' as paranoid in character. By this I mean that it is a milieu which overvalues order, homogeneity and stasis while being suspicious of difference, fluidity and change. It tends to split the world into good and bad parts with very rigid boundaries, and it projects negative qualities onto those groups and individuals imagined to be 'bad'. It is also a milieu which strongly displays a collective desire to order, control or, sometimes, attack outgroups onto which bad qualities have been projected. The article develops an initial theoretical framework for understanding this apparent linkage between a particular occupational milieu and a specific range of emotional orientations to the world. I argue that we might think in terms of the institutional production of affective subject positions -and use ideas taken from
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.