2003
DOI: 10.1080/14759550302801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bodily Entanglement: Bergson and Thresholds in the Sociology of Affect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…'Entanglement' has been used, for example, to characterise the affective relations and discontinuities between human bodies and other entities; 22 to make sense of settler identities in colonial and postcolonial contexts; 23 and to open up the relationships, similarities and intersections between human and non-human things. 24 But it is especially in science and technology studies (STS), and most particularly in feminist STS, that 'entanglement' has been put to work in the last decade or so.…”
Section: Getting Entangledmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…'Entanglement' has been used, for example, to characterise the affective relations and discontinuities between human bodies and other entities; 22 to make sense of settler identities in colonial and postcolonial contexts; 23 and to open up the relationships, similarities and intersections between human and non-human things. 24 But it is especially in science and technology studies (STS), and most particularly in feminist STS, that 'entanglement' has been put to work in the last decade or so.…”
Section: Getting Entangledmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though Wallace stops short of calling Lawrence a "vitalist," he notes that Lawrence had encountered Bergson's ideas as early as 1911, in article by A. J. Balfour, entitled "Creative Evolution and Philosophic Doubt." For other considerations of Lawrence as a vitalist, seeLehan (1992) andWatson (2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As there is no reason to believe that Merrifield has overstated Lefebvre's contempt for Bergson, (5) there is no other option except to suggest that Lefebvre's own hatred was misdirected öor at least more appropriately directed to a false idea of Bergsonism, one that nevertheless is entering its second century. Contemporary research into Bergson's ideas has proved them to be far more complex than previously understood, and more adaptable to other disciplines than Bergson himself was prepared to articulate (Antliff, 1993;Burwick and Douglass, 1992;Deleuze, 2002Deleuze, [19662003a[19832003b[1985Grosz, 2004;Hatzenberger, 2003;Kennedy, 1987;Kumar, 1962;Linstead, 2003;Linstead and Mullarkey, 2003;McNamara, 1996;Mullarkey, 1999a;1999b;Olkowski, 2002;Papanicolau and Gunter, 1987;Power, 2003;Watson, 2003). Lefebvre, in fact, falls prey to the common misconception that…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%