“…As there is no reason to believe that Merrifield has overstated Lefebvre's contempt for Bergson, (5) there is no other option except to suggest that Lefebvre's own hatred was misdirected öor at least more appropriately directed to a false idea of Bergsonism, one that nevertheless is entering its second century. Contemporary research into Bergson's ideas has proved them to be far more complex than previously understood, and more adaptable to other disciplines than Bergson himself was prepared to articulate (Antliff, 1993;Burwick and Douglass, 1992;Deleuze, 2002Deleuze, [19662003a[19832003b[1985Grosz, 2004;Hatzenberger, 2003;Kennedy, 1987;Kumar, 1962;Linstead, 2003;Linstead and Mullarkey, 2003;McNamara, 1996;Mullarkey, 1999a;1999b;Olkowski, 2002;Papanicolau and Gunter, 1987;Power, 2003;Watson, 2003). Lefebvre, in fact, falls prey to the common misconception that…”