1968
DOI: 10.1109/tns.1968.4324961
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plasma Time in Semiconductor Detectors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1970
1970
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4b . Discrepancies between the front irradiation plateau voltage for the model and the measured results may be due to plasma time recombination effects [30,55].…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…4b . Discrepancies between the front irradiation plateau voltage for the model and the measured results may be due to plasma time recombination effects [30,55].…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…A significant difference between the DEÀE and the PSD techniques results from the fact that the former is governed basically by the energy loss process (Bragg curve), while the latter is primarily related to the plasma delay effect (PDE) [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. In silicon detectors, this effect manifests itself with shortening of the pulse rise time with decreasing Z for low and intermediate mass fragments, for which the generated charge is practically completely collected by the detector electrodes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At low electric fields, E, in fact, when more likely it is tp >> T+, regions in the detectors characterised by different 7's cannot be distinguished; on the contrary at higher electric fields, as a consequence of the decrease of the tp with E as it has been already observed in Si [27] and in CdTe [28], the same aforesaid regions can start to be distinguishable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…i) the inequality cc% > cce,, both for front and back exposure, since the plasma effect is stronger for 5.48 MeV a-particles [27];…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%