Pivotal Response Treatment with and without robot-assistance for children with autism: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract

Pivotal response treatment (PRT) is a promising intervention focused on improving social communication skills in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Since robots potentially appeal to children with ASD and may contribute to their motivation for social interaction, this exploratory randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted comparing PRT (PRT and robot-assisted PRT) with treatment-as-usual (TAU). Seventy-three children (PRT: n = 25; PRT + robot: n = 25; TAU: n = 23) with ASD, aged 3–8 years were assessed at baseline, after 10 and 20 weeks of intervention, and at 3-month follow-up. There were no significant group differences on parent- and teacher-rated general social-communicative skills and blindly rated global functioning directly after treatment. However, at follow-up largest gains were observed in robot-assisted PRT compared to other groups. These results suggest that robot-assistance may contribute to intervention efficacy for children with ASD when using game scenarios for robot-child interaction during multiple sessions combined with motivational components of PRT. This trial is registered at https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/4487; NL4487/NTR4712 (2014-08-01).

Pivotal Response Treatment (PRT) parent group training for young children with autism spectrum disorder: a pilot study

“…social-communication skills) but also collateral gains on the development of the child, this study included measures on widespread child and parent outcomes. The results on the independent clinician rated CGI indicated less severe clinical symptoms in global functioning at the end of the intervention, which is in line with previous findings 15 , 21 , 45 , 46 . Also, the improvement rating of the CGI (CGI-I) demonstrated that 80% of the participants showed improvement in global functioning, of which 22% of the participants represented a substantial change and could be indicated as a clinical responder ( very much improved or much improved ).…”

Educational interventions with robots for students on the autism spectrum. A systematic review

“…In addition to the scenario, if we analyze the duration of the interventions carried out, we see that more than half of them have lasted less than a month. Related to everything mentioned above, as many author affirm (Van der Berk-Smeekens, de Korte, van Dongen-Boomsma, Oosterling, den Boer, Barakova & Buitelaar, 2021;Chung, 2021)routines are essential for people on the autism spectrum, so an educational intervention must be adapted to their school schedule and become a routine. This goal cannot be achieved in less than a month.…”

Social Humanoid Robots for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Review of Modalities, Indications, and Pitfalls

“…The results demonstrated that children performing with the RAT significantly improved their socio-emotional skills with respect to the control group. Van den Berk-Smeekens et al [ 13 ] conducted a randomized controlled trial using Pivotal Response Treatment (PRT) with and without NAO robot assistance for improving the social skills of children with ASD. Seventy-three children were randomly assigned into three groups (PRT: n = 25; PRT + robot: n = 25; standard intervention: n = 23).…”