2021
DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/ma36g
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physiological Correlates of Sensory Consciousness: Evidence for a Perceptual Awareness Negativity

Abstract: We critically review the recent literature on six EEG and MEG markers of the neural correlates of consciousness (NCC) for visual, auditory and tactile stimuli in neurotypical volunteers and neurological patients. After ruling out four of these as candidate NCC, we focus on two prominent evoked signals: an early, modality-specific negativity, termed the visual or auditory awareness negativity (VAN and AAN, respectively) and a late, modality-independent positivity termed the P3b. More than twelve diverse experim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 105 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…for not perceived trials but not for perceived, our data is inconsistent with the attribution of the P100 as simply a marker of positive perceptual status. Dembski, Koch, and Pitts (2021) suggest that the N140 negativity is the somatosensory equivalent to the visual and the auditory awareness negativity (VAN and AAN respectively), and that these negativities, collectively, should be considered a main marker of consciousness. However, there is some variability about the interpretation and localization of a negativity occurring at ~140 ms post-stimulus across studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for not perceived trials but not for perceived, our data is inconsistent with the attribution of the P100 as simply a marker of positive perceptual status. Dembski, Koch, and Pitts (2021) suggest that the N140 negativity is the somatosensory equivalent to the visual and the auditory awareness negativity (VAN and AAN respectively), and that these negativities, collectively, should be considered a main marker of consciousness. However, there is some variability about the interpretation and localization of a negativity occurring at ~140 ms post-stimulus across studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%