More than a feeling: scalp EEG and eye correlates of conscious tactile perception

Abstract

Understanding the neural basis of consciousness is a fundamental goal of neuroscience. Many of the studies tackling this question have focused on conscious perception, but these studies have been largely vision-centric, with very few involving tactile perception. Therefore, we developed a novel tactile threshold perception task, which we used in conjunction with high-density scalp electroencephalography and eye-metric recordings. Participants were delivered threshold-level vibrations to one of the four non-thumb fingers, and were asked to report their perception using a response box. With false discovery rate (FDR) mass univariate analysis procedures, we found significant event-related potentials (ERP) including bilateral N140 and P300 for perceived vibrations; significant bilateral P100 and P300 were found following vibrations that were not perceived. Significant differences between perceived and not perceived trials were found bilaterally in the N140 and P300. Additionally, we found that pupil diameter and blink rate increased and that microsaccade rate decreased following vibrations that were perceived relative to those that were not perceived. While many of the signals are consistent with similar ERP-findings across sensory modalities, our results indicating a significant P300 in not perceived trials raise more questions regarding P300’s perceptual meaning. Additionally, our findings support the use of eye metrics as a measure of physiological arousal as pertains to conscious perception, and may represent a novel path toward the creation of tactile no-report tasks in the future.Abstract FigureHighlightsA novel tactile perceptual threshold task yields robust behavioral resultsEvent-related potentials differ according to perception statusP300 is observed in both perceived and not perceived trialsBlink rate, pupil diameter, and microsaccades differ across trial conditions

The influence of spatial and temporal attention on visual awareness - a behavioral and ERP study

“…Regarding LP, our results provide further evidence that this component should not be treated as a specific correlate of visual awareness. Our conclusion is in line with the results of many previous studies in which LP reflected the engagement of attention and cognitive processes rather than conscious access per se ( Pitts et al 2014a;Pitts et al 2014b;Silverstein et al 2015;Koivisto and Grassini 2016;Cohen et al 2020;Doradzińska et al 2020;Dellert et al 2021Dellert et al , 2022Gusso et al 2021;Schlossmacher et al 2021;Schröder et al 2021).…”