The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2012.00830.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogenetic study of the Characinae (Teleostei: Characiformes: Characidae)

Abstract: The Characinae is a subunit of the Characidae of special significance in including Charax, the type genus of the family and the order Characiformes. Twelve genera and 79 species have been traditionally assigned to the Characinae, but the subfamily still lacks a phylogenetic diagnosis. Herein, a data matrix including 150 morphological characters and 64 taxa (35 species representing all genera of the Characinae and 29 included in other lineages within the Characiformes) was submitted to two cladistic analyses th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
65
0
13

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
(551 reference statements)
4
65
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…None of them resemble the unique shape of the yolk sac described herein. This unique shape of the yolk sac was not reported in any of the many representatives of the Characiformes available in the literature (e.g., Nakatani et al, 2001;Ponton & Mérigoux, 2001; most of the references on ontogeny of characiforms cited above) and could hence constitute an additional synapomorphy for the clade comprising at least Heterocharax and Gnathocharax (the Heterocharacini of Mattox & Toledo-Piza, 2012). This hypothesis, however, can only be properly tested when more developmental series of representatives of the Heterocharacini are available, and it is herein proposed only as a putative additional character for this clade.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…None of them resemble the unique shape of the yolk sac described herein. This unique shape of the yolk sac was not reported in any of the many representatives of the Characiformes available in the literature (e.g., Nakatani et al, 2001;Ponton & Mérigoux, 2001; most of the references on ontogeny of characiforms cited above) and could hence constitute an additional synapomorphy for the clade comprising at least Heterocharax and Gnathocharax (the Heterocharacini of Mattox & Toledo-Piza, 2012). This hypothesis, however, can only be properly tested when more developmental series of representatives of the Heterocharacini are available, and it is herein proposed only as a putative additional character for this clade.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2), in addition to Roestes and Gilbertolus in a separate tribe (Roestini). The Heterocharacinae as defined by Mattox & Toledo-Piza (2012) was supported by seven non-ambiguous synapomorphies, one of which exclusive of the subfamily, and the less inclusive Heterocharacini was diagnosed by seven non-ambiguous synapomorphies, one of them exclusive of the tribe. None of the heterocharacines have been the focus of developmental studies, and moreover, juvenile specimens are often difficult to identify as their young are similar to each other.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…20), so that the ontogenetic variation is not clearly reflected by the data. Mattox, Toledo-Piza (2012) reported some osteological differences between specimens of Galeocharax from the rio Amazonas basin and the upper rio Paraná basin, that could help to diagnose two distinct forms. According to their observations specimens of Galeocharax from the rio Amazonas basin have the anterior margin of the palatine divided into two distinct articulation regions, a medial region associated with the neurocranium and a lateral region associated with the medial process of the maxilla.…”
Section: Geographic Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%