2017
DOI: 10.1590/1982-0224-20160040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taxonomic revision of Galeocharax (Characiformes: Characidae: Characinae)

Abstract: The taxonomy of Galeocharax, a genus of freshwater fishes distributed in most South American cis-Andean river systems, except the rio Negro, rio São Francisco and rio Xingu basins and the eastern drainages of Brazil, is herein revised. A total of 1229 specimens were examined from which 680 had meristic and morphometric data taken. Osteological and morphological features were also examined through radiographs, scanning electron microscopy and in cleared and stained specimens. Three of the four species previousl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wallace (1889) was the first to note that water type influenced the composition of fish assemblages in the Amazon (Dagosta and de Pinna, 2018), an observation repeatedly confirmed in subsequent studies (see Roberts, 1972;Kullander, 1986;Goulding et al, 1988;Vari, 1988;Araujo-Lima and Goulding, 1997;Saint-Paul et al, 2000;Lima and Ribeiro, 2011). The extremely acidic water of the Rio Negro, in particular, may be a deterrent to many Pinna, 2017; Reis, 1989), the genera Galeocharax (see Giovannetti et al, 2017) and Hypoptopoma (see Aquino and Schaefer, 2010), and several species such as Anostomus ternetzi (see Lima and Ribeiro, 2011), Brachyplatystoma juruense, Cheirocerus goeldii (see Stewart and Pavlik, 1985), Copella stigmasemion (see Marinho and Menezes, 2017), Curimatella dor¬ salis (see Vari, 1992a), Hemiodus microlepis (see Langeani, 1996) (Grande, 1985;Hunn and Upchurch, 2001;Morrone, 2009) expected outside: 9.5; observed outside: 0; X2 = 19. X2 >3.841, rejects the null hypothesis, i.e., the species is not randomly distributed.…”
Section: Amazon Corementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wallace (1889) was the first to note that water type influenced the composition of fish assemblages in the Amazon (Dagosta and de Pinna, 2018), an observation repeatedly confirmed in subsequent studies (see Roberts, 1972;Kullander, 1986;Goulding et al, 1988;Vari, 1988;Araujo-Lima and Goulding, 1997;Saint-Paul et al, 2000;Lima and Ribeiro, 2011). The extremely acidic water of the Rio Negro, in particular, may be a deterrent to many Pinna, 2017; Reis, 1989), the genera Galeocharax (see Giovannetti et al, 2017) and Hypoptopoma (see Aquino and Schaefer, 2010), and several species such as Anostomus ternetzi (see Lima and Ribeiro, 2011), Brachyplatystoma juruense, Cheirocerus goeldii (see Stewart and Pavlik, 1985), Copella stigmasemion (see Marinho and Menezes, 2017), Curimatella dor¬ salis (see Vari, 1992a), Hemiodus microlepis (see Langeani, 1996) (Grande, 1985;Hunn and Upchurch, 2001;Morrone, 2009) expected outside: 9.5; observed outside: 0; X2 = 19. X2 >3.841, rejects the null hypothesis, i.e., the species is not randomly distributed.…”
Section: Amazon Corementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distribution. Río Orinoco, rio Oyapok, rio Araguaia-Tocantins, upper rio Paraná and Amazon (except the rio Negro and rio Xingu) basins (Giovannetti et al, 2017).…”
Section: Galeocharaxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Galeocharax gulo was identified as G. knerii by . Giovannetti et al (2017), in a revisionary study of Galeocharax Fowler, 1910, proposed the new synonym.…”
Section: Galeocharaxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ota et al (2018) suggested that the occurrence of Hoplerythrinus unitaeniatus in the Upper Paraná River can be associated with its introduction as a live bait or after inundation of the Sete Quedas Falls after the construction of the Itaipu dam. Galeocharax gulo is widely distributed in almost all Upper Amazon River systems, also in the Orinoco, Oyapok, Araguaia-Tocantins, and Paraná rivers (Giovannetti et al 2017). The occurrence of this species in the Upper Paraná system may be a result of natural dispersion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%